Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Complete Arcane: Too Much Wu-Jen?!?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="arscott" data-source="post: 1871915" data-attributes="member: 17969"><p>look at it this way: If you looked through the PHB spell list, would you thing "hey, why are all the spells in here wizard and cleric spells. the ranger and druid really got shafted"?</p><p></p><p>There are three core classes presented in the book, and it wouldn't be fair unless the book provided support for those three classes. So if the classes were mechanically similar, it would be reasonable to expect that better portion of the spells in the book were divided between the three classes.</p><p></p><p>But the classes aren't mechanically similar. The warmage has an intentionally limited list of spells. Including a bunch of new warmage spells in CA would be as ridiculous as having the Paladin's spells in the PHB be as numerous as the wizard's. And the Warlock doesn't cast spells at all. That leaves the Wu Jen, who therefore ought to have a large portion of the book's spells devoted to it, as is in fact the case.</p><p></p><p>The wu jen needs it's own spell list with its own flavor. If not, there's very little point in having the class at all. Several posts here have already alluded to the fact that a wu jen isn't much more than a flavorful wizard. And if all of those Wu Jen only spells were available to wizards and sorcerors, what would be the point of playing a wu jen at all?</p><p></p><p>If I ever run a campaign without clerics and druids, then I'm going to make damn sure that wizards have access to the healing spells. But if my campaign does have clerics and druids, allowing the wizards to access healing magic would be downright stupid. Likewise, there's nothing wrong with allowing wizards and the occasional druid to cast wu jen spells in a wu jenless campaign, but that's not a reason to mark all of the wu jen spells as Wiz/Sor.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="arscott, post: 1871915, member: 17969"] look at it this way: If you looked through the PHB spell list, would you thing "hey, why are all the spells in here wizard and cleric spells. the ranger and druid really got shafted"? There are three core classes presented in the book, and it wouldn't be fair unless the book provided support for those three classes. So if the classes were mechanically similar, it would be reasonable to expect that better portion of the spells in the book were divided between the three classes. But the classes aren't mechanically similar. The warmage has an intentionally limited list of spells. Including a bunch of new warmage spells in CA would be as ridiculous as having the Paladin's spells in the PHB be as numerous as the wizard's. And the Warlock doesn't cast spells at all. That leaves the Wu Jen, who therefore ought to have a large portion of the book's spells devoted to it, as is in fact the case. The wu jen needs it's own spell list with its own flavor. If not, there's very little point in having the class at all. Several posts here have already alluded to the fact that a wu jen isn't much more than a flavorful wizard. And if all of those Wu Jen only spells were available to wizards and sorcerors, what would be the point of playing a wu jen at all? If I ever run a campaign without clerics and druids, then I'm going to make damn sure that wizards have access to the healing spells. But if my campaign does have clerics and druids, allowing the wizards to access healing magic would be downright stupid. Likewise, there's nothing wrong with allowing wizards and the occasional druid to cast wu jen spells in a wu jenless campaign, but that's not a reason to mark all of the wu jen spells as Wiz/Sor. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Complete Arcane: Too Much Wu-Jen?!?
Top