Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Shard O'Glase" data-source="post: 1856859" data-attributes="member: 1134">I'm guessing because they must of done some research that showed most campaigns used non spellcasting mosnters as the primary foe.  Me I never had any problems with persistent or long duration spells but in my games dispels fly frequently enough that a persistant spell almost is a wate of a high level spell.I definetly think they went with overkill in reducing durations and persistent at +6 spell levels it can only apply to 0-3rd level spells and at the earliest for any real spells(1st level) the earliest you can do it is at 13th level.  Heck even the better 3e shield isn't worth a 7th level slot, and the 3.5 shield is a joke as a 7th level slot.  A couple of the divine spells may be on the weak side at +6 levels but not a joke but I haven't seen persistent since this change initially shown in FR.I still go back to if they wanted to change it they should of revamped it from the ground up.  I'd of made it a +2 spell level feat that bumped up the time category 1 level. from rounds to minutes, minutes to 10 mintues, 10 mintues to hours, hours to a flat 24 hours.  And I make this an exception to the rule and allow it to be applied multiple times to the same spell.</blockquote>