Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Complete Arcane - What's in it!!
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WizarDru" data-source="post: 1858248" data-attributes="member: 151"><p>One <em>could</em> say that, but one <em>could </em>also call that a straw man, since it's not an apples-to-apples comparison. The main issue was that Dalamar felt that this feat resulted in, essentially, 68,000 free gold. Several folks have disagreed with those numbers.</p><p> </p><p> It's a good feat, I think that's generally agreed upon. However, I don't think you'll get universal agreement that a wizard would always take this feat. Many would, but others would not. At 1st level, for example, a +1 to your DC is much more valuable than having two additional free spells when you turn 2nd level. As with most "<em>but by 20th level</em>" analyses, the breakdown assumes a vacuum of pure numbers, and not practical adventuring, which is what many of the numbers above are addressing. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> I'm not sure what you're saying here...that you would create a feat that turned a sorceror into a wizard? Sorcerors get more spell slots in return for their lack of spell choice. A feat like you describe, forcing them to memorize their spells would essentially make them wizards with a slightly different skill list and more spell slots. Does it remove their choice to choose spontaneous spellcasting? Are their spell choices still limited? You've given too few details to make any sort of an analysis, or why anyone would take it.</p><p> </p><p> Most of the applications you mention make a bunch of assumptions that center around ignoring the various workarounds provided in the system for wizards to have an easier time of scribing, and also assumes that the only way to get said spells is from purchase at market price. Treasure, fellow party members and serveral magic items make this an easier task. You also make the mistake of producing lump numbers for the gp value. You're using the 'at 20th level' number...but it's not a cash check for 33,000 gp (assuming you accept that number), but more like 1650 per level. A free stat item at 20th level is not the same thing as a Belt of Giant Strength at 5th or 10th, and it's not a fair comparison, I think.</p><p> </p><p> Assuming a character makes extra spellbooks on the cheap, as you describe, what is the practical ingame effect of this? Having two, ten or thirty extra spellbooks is effectively the same. You're still not casting more than one spell a round, and you're not getting more damage, a higher DC, better spell penetration, added effects or anything else to your spells. It's not found money. Just like you make the assumption that someone would normally only pay for certain spells, since they're only for crafting. I might buy that for Boccob's book, but not for Boots of Speed. </p><p> </p><p> Again, I agree it's a good feat. I just don't see it as being particularly powerful or unbalancing.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WizarDru, post: 1858248, member: 151"] One [i]could[/i] say that, but one [i]could [/i]also call that a straw man, since it's not an apples-to-apples comparison. The main issue was that Dalamar felt that this feat resulted in, essentially, 68,000 free gold. Several folks have disagreed with those numbers. It's a good feat, I think that's generally agreed upon. However, I don't think you'll get universal agreement that a wizard would always take this feat. Many would, but others would not. At 1st level, for example, a +1 to your DC is much more valuable than having two additional free spells when you turn 2nd level. As with most "[i]but by 20th level[/i]" analyses, the breakdown assumes a vacuum of pure numbers, and not practical adventuring, which is what many of the numbers above are addressing. I'm not sure what you're saying here...that you would create a feat that turned a sorceror into a wizard? Sorcerors get more spell slots in return for their lack of spell choice. A feat like you describe, forcing them to memorize their spells would essentially make them wizards with a slightly different skill list and more spell slots. Does it remove their choice to choose spontaneous spellcasting? Are their spell choices still limited? You've given too few details to make any sort of an analysis, or why anyone would take it. Most of the applications you mention make a bunch of assumptions that center around ignoring the various workarounds provided in the system for wizards to have an easier time of scribing, and also assumes that the only way to get said spells is from purchase at market price. Treasure, fellow party members and serveral magic items make this an easier task. You also make the mistake of producing lump numbers for the gp value. You're using the 'at 20th level' number...but it's not a cash check for 33,000 gp (assuming you accept that number), but more like 1650 per level. A free stat item at 20th level is not the same thing as a Belt of Giant Strength at 5th or 10th, and it's not a fair comparison, I think. Assuming a character makes extra spellbooks on the cheap, as you describe, what is the practical ingame effect of this? Having two, ten or thirty extra spellbooks is effectively the same. You're still not casting more than one spell a round, and you're not getting more damage, a higher DC, better spell penetration, added effects or anything else to your spells. It's not found money. Just like you make the assumption that someone would normally only pay for certain spells, since they're only for crafting. I might buy that for Boccob's book, but not for Boots of Speed. Again, I agree it's a good feat. I just don't see it as being particularly powerful or unbalancing. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Complete Arcane - What's in it!!
Top