Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Complete Disagreement With Mike on Monsters (see post #205)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MoogleEmpMog" data-source="post: 3720004" data-attributes="member: 22882"><p>Here's the thing.</p><p></p><p>I'm COMPLETELY fine with THIS.</p><p></p><p>I LOVE Spycraft 2.0's NPC generation table and use it often for other games, even though it's not an exact match. It's wonderfully simple and easy to use.</p><p></p><p>BUT, if the Monster Manual takes this route, and neither it nor the Player's Handbook provide the more complex PC Race rules for the monsters... then anyone playing anything but bog standard Tolkienesque D&D (+ Merlin/Elric/Hellboy/DMC Dante-inspired half-fiends at least previously tied to the Planescape Great Wheel) is completely hosed.</p><p></p><p>They can hope and pray for a Savage Species type book, or they can houserule all of it - which means considerably more work than they would have had to put into cleaned-up and somewhat streamlined PC-style monsters.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why should that be the first consideration?</p><p></p><p>If D&D is to be "highly specific D&D fantasy set in the Forgotten Realms or Greyhawk with very tight setting-based restrictions on PCs" - then it's no longer a game I'm interested in. It will almost certainly be better designed than AD&D, and more to my tastes mechanically than Castles and Crusades, but from a flavor perspective I might as well be playing those games.</p><p></p><p>3.5 has a lot of problems, but, as the wealth of d20 games attests, its moddability was one of its greatests strengths. It's currently the only version of D&D I would consider playing, because it's the only version that can handle the kind of settings and playstyles I'm interested in without houserules sufficient to be a system unto themselves.</p><p></p><p>You bolded my suggestions of Final Fantasy, World of Darkness and Shadowrun - yet Final Fantasy could be run reasonably well, though not perfectly, with humans as the only playable race, and Shadowrun is fairly close to D&D in its PC racial choices (trolls being the big question mark). Dragonlance, Planescape, Dark Sun and Spelljammer, all of which are <u>D&D</u> settings, present considerably more problems.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MoogleEmpMog, post: 3720004, member: 22882"] Here's the thing. I'm COMPLETELY fine with THIS. I LOVE Spycraft 2.0's NPC generation table and use it often for other games, even though it's not an exact match. It's wonderfully simple and easy to use. BUT, if the Monster Manual takes this route, and neither it nor the Player's Handbook provide the more complex PC Race rules for the monsters... then anyone playing anything but bog standard Tolkienesque D&D (+ Merlin/Elric/Hellboy/DMC Dante-inspired half-fiends at least previously tied to the Planescape Great Wheel) is completely hosed. They can hope and pray for a Savage Species type book, or they can houserule all of it - which means considerably more work than they would have had to put into cleaned-up and somewhat streamlined PC-style monsters. Why should that be the first consideration? If D&D is to be "highly specific D&D fantasy set in the Forgotten Realms or Greyhawk with very tight setting-based restrictions on PCs" - then it's no longer a game I'm interested in. It will almost certainly be better designed than AD&D, and more to my tastes mechanically than Castles and Crusades, but from a flavor perspective I might as well be playing those games. 3.5 has a lot of problems, but, as the wealth of d20 games attests, its moddability was one of its greatests strengths. It's currently the only version of D&D I would consider playing, because it's the only version that can handle the kind of settings and playstyles I'm interested in without houserules sufficient to be a system unto themselves. You bolded my suggestions of Final Fantasy, World of Darkness and Shadowrun - yet Final Fantasy could be run reasonably well, though not perfectly, with humans as the only playable race, and Shadowrun is fairly close to D&D in its PC racial choices (trolls being the big question mark). Dragonlance, Planescape, Dark Sun and Spelljammer, all of which are [U]D&D[/U] settings, present considerably more problems. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Complete Disagreement With Mike on Monsters (see post #205)
Top