Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Felon" data-source="post: 1483226" data-attributes="member: 8158">Now that's a curious remark. A Deepwood Sniper can still have the same prerequisites, still offer the same class features--what about it does WotC need to &quot;pick up&quot;?Are you suggesting that even though a prestige class or feat is unaffected by any of the rules changes in 3.5e, and thus doesn't really need any revision, they have to revise it anyway just show everyone it's still &quot;legal&quot; to play? If that's what you think, then suit yourself, but do realize that you basically just made that rule up arbitrarily. I've certainly never heard any official statement from WotC rendering all previous 3e material null and void, nor have they made any commitment to dedicate the Complete series or any other 3.5e products to reprinting every single feat and PrC from past products simply&nbsp; just to show that they haven't been &quot;dropped&quot; (whatever that actually means).If I'm interpreting your meaning incorrectly, please elaborate. And if I'm not, please elaborate anyway.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Felon, post: 1483226, member: 8158"] Now that's a curious remark. A Deepwood Sniper can still have the same prerequisites, still offer the same class features--what about it does WotC need to "pick up"? Are you suggesting that even though a prestige class or feat is unaffected by any of the rules changes in 3.5e, and thus doesn't really need any revision, they have to revise it anyway just show everyone it's still "legal" to play? If that's what you think, then suit yourself, but do realize that you basically just made that rule up arbitrarily. I've certainly never heard any official statement from WotC rendering all previous 3e material null and void, nor have they made any commitment to dedicate the Complete series or any other 3.5e products to reprinting every single feat and PrC from past products simply just to show that they haven't been "dropped" (whatever that actually means). If I'm interpreting your meaning incorrectly, please elaborate. And if I'm not, please elaborate anyway. [/QUOTE]

Verification