Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Twowolves" data-source="post: 3133359" data-attributes="member: 18093">Two separate points: They say these feats give wizards something to contribute per round, to which I say the old way of doing this was wands and scrolls, which are finite and require money and/or xp. The utility reserve feats give an ability that frees up item slots (ring/helm).I'm saying that Magic Missile, which when 3rd ed was being built, was considered almost too powerful for a 1st level spell (range, autohit, no save, affects incorporeal) is now almost moot by the time the zappy reserve feats are available. It goes to my estimation that these feats are too good.Flying archers have a finite limit; arrows. They also rely on another player or a magic item to give them flight capability. Archers don't have area of effect. Archers can be disarmed. I will agree, it's early to tell, but here you say no one wants more than one or two? It's gone from &quot;must have&quot; to &quot;must have only one or two&quot;?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Twowolves, post: 3133359, member: 18093"] Two separate points: They say these feats give wizards something to contribute per round, to which I say the old way of doing this was wands and scrolls, which are finite and require money and/or xp. The utility reserve feats give an ability that frees up item slots (ring/helm). I'm saying that Magic Missile, which when 3rd ed was being built, was considered almost too powerful for a 1st level spell (range, autohit, no save, affects incorporeal) is now almost moot by the time the zappy reserve feats are available. It goes to my estimation that these feats are too good. Flying archers have a finite limit; arrows. They also rely on another player or a magic item to give them flight capability. Archers don't have area of effect. Archers can be disarmed. I will agree, it's early to tell, but here you say no one wants more than one or two? It's gone from "must have" to "must have only one or two"? [/QUOTE]

Verification