Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Driddle" data-source="post: 3087806" data-attributes="member: 3447">The game already has more than enough "base" classes to work with, when what we really need are more small-change options for those classes. There's really no reason to devote four pages to a hypothetical "arcane ranger," for example, when all you need is four paragraphs to describe component substitutions -- this spelll list instead of that spell list, for example, and these skills instead of those skills. As for this product, I'm ever so miffed that familiars got nothing! For all the complaints we hear from gamers around here that a familiar is a worthless mage benefit, you'd think WotC would spend some time providing alternative interpretations or something to beef up the little critters. But noooooo!!!....</blockquote>