Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Psion" data-source="post: 3089941" data-attributes="member: 172">Let's just say I differ with you on this point philosophically. The rogue/ranger thing is a naked (and unnecessary) attempt at niche protection. Having a spell list that defines a certain feel is fair game IMO. (I'll give you a nod that it could have been fewer spells, but still, I'll take one well supported class over 5 "class mill" classes any day.)Adaptive learning is just compensating for the fact that those classes should have never existed as classes in the first place.If a class is well supported, then there is no reason it shouldn't see usage as long as it fits the campaign. Poorly supported classes, OTOH, contend with being outshone by their better supported cousins.</blockquote>