Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="bert1001 fka bert1000" data-source="post: 8472859" data-attributes="member: 7029588">This is an amazing amount of work!&nbsp;&nbsp; Look forward to taking a closer look.&nbsp;&nbsp; Zeitgeist should fit PF2e very well as much like 4e it seems built around the &quot;encounter&quot; and can handle the 1-2 awesome set piece fights between lots of exploration, investigation, etc. without the potential short rest/long rest class difference 5e issues.&nbsp; Curious, on the creature side did you start with the 5e, PF1, or 4e version?&nbsp;&nbsp; I always thought the 4e version had the best mechanics and powers and they could be converted into fairly cool PF2e abilities since Pf2e no longer has the monster creation limitations of PF1/3.5.Given the precedent of early &quot;free archetypes&quot; like in Strength of Thousands, what was the thinking behind using backgrounds and special Theme feats vs. having an early accessable free archetype built around each Zeigeist Theme?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="bert1001 fka bert1000, post: 8472859, member: 7029588"] This is an amazing amount of work! Look forward to taking a closer look. Zeitgeist should fit PF2e very well as much like 4e it seems built around the "encounter" and can handle the 1-2 awesome set piece fights between lots of exploration, investigation, etc. without the potential short rest/long rest class difference 5e issues. Curious, on the creature side did you start with the 5e, PF1, or 4e version? I always thought the 4e version had the best mechanics and powers and they could be converted into fairly cool PF2e abilities since Pf2e no longer has the monster creation limitations of PF1/3.5. Given the precedent of early "free archetypes" like in Strength of Thousands, what was the thinking behind using backgrounds and special Theme feats vs. having an early accessable free archetype built around each Zeigeist Theme? [/QUOTE]

Verification