Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Razz" data-source="post: 2826003" data-attributes="member: 3014">As an avid super-fan of psionics I must say:It still sucks.Yeah, I do have use for the new classes, I like Divine Mind and Lurk especially, Ardent's ok. A few of the powers are neat, the mantle thing is alright, and a few feats are ok. The monsters are always cool. The small number of prestige classes irks me to no end, but I am happy with there being any in the first place.Other than that, the rest is crap and will remain that way. I am only going to be able to enjoy half the book, maybe a little less. It's still terribly done and gave almost no one what they wanted more of in psionic games.My question is what does Bruce Cordell have to say about all the negative comments? Him and the other writers are so quick to answer questions about the books they write, but they never comment on the negative reactions received and why things were done the way they were done. People tend to lose faith in others when they screw up something and don't give some sort of explanation and/or apology for it.I'm not talking about a few negative reactions. I mean widespread ones like this Complete Psionics fiasco. I mean, did he really think most of the psionic community would be happy with this book? Did the writers even give it a good read over a few times? I mean, come on, I read over what I just wrote and immediately begin thinking "This won't fly. That's crap. I need to fix that."They're doing another round of the "Complete" series again, with Complete Mage and Complete Scoundrel. When it comes time for Complete Psionics II, let's hope they get things right this time.</blockquote>

Verification