Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Complete Scoundrel] Improved Skirmish feat...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="drexes" data-source="post: 3301970" data-attributes="member: 24176"><p>All power creep bitterness aside, I think the scout is a lot of fun, I started one when they first came out as a scout/fighter with a level of barbarian to boot. He's a melee scout using the spring attack trick now and while he's not the most dangerous combatant I've ever played or seen, he's no slouch. I disagree with the above post that the fighter and wizard have become obsolete with the duskblade, nor has the ranger been ousted by the scout. My feelings have always been that there has never been any need for game balance between character classes for the most part so long as each class has things it does well, while it still has a need to be in a diverse party so that its weaknesses are hard to exploit, after all thats why we travel in packs, safety in numbers. There was never balance between the classes a low level wizard is way too weak and a high level wizard is far and away the strongest member of a party, but really that all on paper. The play's the thing. I've seen too many "uber" characters who couldn't survive an intro encounter because the player was obsessed with the strength of their character on paper and didn't notice that everyone has a weakness, even if it's simply dice. And I've seen supposedly pathetic characters become the real power of a party because of the creativity of the player overshadowed some bad stats and lack of equipment. </p><p></p><p>But here's what I think is really important, and in my experience it's true, if players play the concepts of their characters and not the paper of them then balance will take care of itself. As a DM it's important to reward, through experience points, equipment, and unique opportunity those players who dedicate themselves to the style of play that is good for your group, and encourage players to remain a cohesive group. That doesn't have the slightest thing to do with intra-party strife by the way, I encourage that whenever possible, I mean discouraging intra-group strife by making a group filled with guys with similar play styles. Purist roleplayers and rollplayers don't play well together usually.</p><p></p><p>Well eneough rambling...sorry about that guys... got off on a tangent, couldn't find an exit ramp...</p><p></p><p>Drexes</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="drexes, post: 3301970, member: 24176"] All power creep bitterness aside, I think the scout is a lot of fun, I started one when they first came out as a scout/fighter with a level of barbarian to boot. He's a melee scout using the spring attack trick now and while he's not the most dangerous combatant I've ever played or seen, he's no slouch. I disagree with the above post that the fighter and wizard have become obsolete with the duskblade, nor has the ranger been ousted by the scout. My feelings have always been that there has never been any need for game balance between character classes for the most part so long as each class has things it does well, while it still has a need to be in a diverse party so that its weaknesses are hard to exploit, after all thats why we travel in packs, safety in numbers. There was never balance between the classes a low level wizard is way too weak and a high level wizard is far and away the strongest member of a party, but really that all on paper. The play's the thing. I've seen too many "uber" characters who couldn't survive an intro encounter because the player was obsessed with the strength of their character on paper and didn't notice that everyone has a weakness, even if it's simply dice. And I've seen supposedly pathetic characters become the real power of a party because of the creativity of the player overshadowed some bad stats and lack of equipment. But here's what I think is really important, and in my experience it's true, if players play the concepts of their characters and not the paper of them then balance will take care of itself. As a DM it's important to reward, through experience points, equipment, and unique opportunity those players who dedicate themselves to the style of play that is good for your group, and encourage players to remain a cohesive group. That doesn't have the slightest thing to do with intra-party strife by the way, I encourage that whenever possible, I mean discouraging intra-group strife by making a group filled with guys with similar play styles. Purist roleplayers and rollplayers don't play well together usually. Well eneough rambling...sorry about that guys... got off on a tangent, couldn't find an exit ramp... Drexes [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
[Complete Scoundrel] Improved Skirmish feat...
Top