Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Million Dollar TTRPG Crowdfunders
Most Anticipated Tabletop RPGs Of The Year
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
ShortQuests -- individual adventure modules! An all-new collection of digest-sized D&D adventures designed to plug in to your game.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Complete Warrior Samurai Thread
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celtavian" data-source="post: 1239219" data-attributes="member: 5834"><p><strong>re</strong></p><p></p><p>I don't think the class needs to be historically accurate, but it should be customizable to fit a variety of visions of the Samurai. The OA Samurai did this just fine. The Samurai basically is a fighter with a few tweaks, and I don't see why it needed any seasoning considering it was nicely customizable. The Prc's in OA allowed a Samurai to individualize his or her path to an even greater degree. They should have just made a few Prc's specifically geared towards the Samurai in the CW, rather than making a limiting Samurai core class.</p><p></p><p>This new Samurai limits the playable Samurai archetypes. And for those of us who like Samurai and know about the various archetypes, the new Samurai is far too constraining.</p><p></p><p>Like me for example, I am currently playing a fictional Samurai based on the Samurai in the film <em>Yojimbo</em>, a two-handed Katana wielder. That movie really made me want to play a Samurai. If only the CW version of the Samurai were available, I wouldn't be able to do it. </p><p></p><p>Now it seems to me that James Wyatt did alot research when making OA. He made a customizable Samurai class that could fit a variety of archetypes as well as do well in a fantasy setting. I don't see why the designers of the CW couldn't see that James Wyatt's version of the Samurai was far superior to their creation for a core class.</p><p></p><p>Now if this new Samurai were a Prc, I wouldn't have batted an eyelash. Why? Because it would have simply been a way to create a particular Samurai archetype, and that would have been fine. Instead, this new version of the Samurai is a core class forcing a particular archetype on anyone who wants to play a Samurai. IMO, that shouldn't have been the case. It shows a lack of research by the designer of the Samurai core class into the variety of Samurai archetypes (fictional and historical-for example, there were even female Samurai that used a polearm as a primary weapon) that exist.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celtavian, post: 1239219, member: 5834"] [b]re[/b] I don't think the class needs to be historically accurate, but it should be customizable to fit a variety of visions of the Samurai. The OA Samurai did this just fine. The Samurai basically is a fighter with a few tweaks, and I don't see why it needed any seasoning considering it was nicely customizable. The Prc's in OA allowed a Samurai to individualize his or her path to an even greater degree. They should have just made a few Prc's specifically geared towards the Samurai in the CW, rather than making a limiting Samurai core class. This new Samurai limits the playable Samurai archetypes. And for those of us who like Samurai and know about the various archetypes, the new Samurai is far too constraining. Like me for example, I am currently playing a fictional Samurai based on the Samurai in the film [i]Yojimbo[/i], a two-handed Katana wielder. That movie really made me want to play a Samurai. If only the CW version of the Samurai were available, I wouldn't be able to do it. Now it seems to me that James Wyatt did alot research when making OA. He made a customizable Samurai class that could fit a variety of archetypes as well as do well in a fantasy setting. I don't see why the designers of the CW couldn't see that James Wyatt's version of the Samurai was far superior to their creation for a core class. Now if this new Samurai were a Prc, I wouldn't have batted an eyelash. Why? Because it would have simply been a way to create a particular Samurai archetype, and that would have been fine. Instead, this new version of the Samurai is a core class forcing a particular archetype on anyone who wants to play a Samurai. IMO, that shouldn't have been the case. It shows a lack of research by the designer of the Samurai core class into the variety of Samurai archetypes (fictional and historical-for example, there were even female Samurai that used a polearm as a primary weapon) that exist. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Complete Warrior Samurai Thread
Top