Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="freyar" data-source="post: 5968972" data-attributes="member: 40227">I'd agree with this philosophy, just base it on how different they are.&nbsp; The infernites and pasari-niml are sort of like formians, which have just a single main entry in the SRD.&nbsp; It would be reasonable to use potential anchor links for the formian-like subentries.If darjr gets the anchor links going, I'd support going with the extra credit note and the anchor link.Thanks for asking.Well, there's a note from someone named Sam about doing something with the database software.&nbsp; Morrus may know who that is, but I'd think Scott Greene (Grazzt with no apostrophe) would know for sure.I'm not sure I want to ask this much from darjr just right now, but the CC database almost seems like it would be easier to use if it just had fields for name, edition, type, and CR and then just a big field for plain html.&nbsp; That way, we could just copy in the whole statblock at once instead of one field at a time.&nbsp; I guess we'll see how user-friendly the database ends up in practice.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="freyar, post: 5968972, member: 40227"] I'd agree with this philosophy, just base it on how different they are. The infernites and pasari-niml are sort of like formians, which have just a single main entry in the SRD. It would be reasonable to use potential anchor links for the formian-like subentries. If darjr gets the anchor links going, I'd support going with the extra credit note and the anchor link. Thanks for asking. Well, there's a note from someone named Sam about doing something with the database software. Morrus may know who that is, but I'd think Scott Greene (Grazzt with no apostrophe) would know for sure. I'm not sure I want to ask this much from darjr just right now, but the CC database almost seems like it would be easier to use if it just had fields for name, edition, type, and CR and then just a big field for plain html. That way, we could just copy in the whole statblock at once instead of one field at a time. I guess we'll see how user-friendly the database ends up in practice. [/QUOTE]

Verification