Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="DM with a vengence" data-source="post: 338434" data-attributes="member: 1679">Scientific American-I don't know about the Liberal soapbox thing, but I find that they have the best hard science of any of the magizines.  Some stuff for the laymen, and then other articles with lots of complicated graphs labeled along the lines of "Lightyears from Emission Source (LES)" and "Neutrino Scatter Field (NCF)" that then go on to prove that due to the spikes in the NCF, the universe, is in fact, shaped like a dill pickle.  If you like knowing a lot about physics, chemistry, and molecular biology, and possibly more than you understand, get Scientific American.Discover-Medicine, pyschology, and enviomentalism.  Discover tends to shy away from some of the harder areas, and instead focus on what affects our day to day lives instead of a new type of sub-atomic particle that means that the universe will keep on working the way it has been for the past billion years.  Discover is about the middle in terms of difficulty.  On the down side, I feel that the quality of the articles has been decreasing over the past few years, although that just may mean that I know more than their giving me.Natural Geographic- The name says it all.  Nature in far away places.  While it definetly has the best photography, I don't care much for the great outdoors and so I recently stopped renewing my subscription.  If you like animals and anthropology, then get National Geo, but otherwise give it a miss.</blockquote>

Verification