Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Complexity vs. Depth -- A Look Inside Pathfinder 2nd Edition
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="FrogReaver" data-source="post: 7787592" data-attributes="member: 6795602"><p>The argument is that when you have a shield equipped the +2 AC is almost always better than making a third attack. </p><p></p><p>The question of balance arises when comparing sword and shield using the +2 AC bonus action to two handed weapon.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Even then, there's always some efficiency in being able to choose which action to use at what time. Suppose there were 2 actions one did double damage to enemies that were an even number of feet tall. The other did double damage two enemies that were an odd number of feet tall. Then provided you face an equal number of evenly and oddly tall people - then you have increased your average damage by being given the choice of being able to choose an equally comparable action. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Sure, but the question here isn't one about sword and shield making the attack or taking the AC. The AC action is a better use of your third action in nearly all situations than a third attack. Thus, the action granted by equipping a shield doesn't fall in the category of an action that provides an option but no general benefit.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="FrogReaver, post: 7787592, member: 6795602"] The argument is that when you have a shield equipped the +2 AC is almost always better than making a third attack. The question of balance arises when comparing sword and shield using the +2 AC bonus action to two handed weapon. Even then, there's always some efficiency in being able to choose which action to use at what time. Suppose there were 2 actions one did double damage to enemies that were an even number of feet tall. The other did double damage two enemies that were an odd number of feet tall. Then provided you face an equal number of evenly and oddly tall people - then you have increased your average damage by being given the choice of being able to choose an equally comparable action. Sure, but the question here isn't one about sword and shield making the attack or taking the AC. The AC action is a better use of your third action in nearly all situations than a third attack. Thus, the action granted by equipping a shield doesn't fall in the category of an action that provides an option but no general benefit. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Complexity vs. Depth -- A Look Inside Pathfinder 2nd Edition
Top