Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Comprehension problems
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="El Mahdi" data-source="post: 5862018" data-attributes="member: 59506"><p>I don't think this is about IQ at all. People process information in different ways, and some are better at certain ways than others. Besides, don't worry so much about IQ. Common consensus today is that it's not as good an indicator of Intelligence as we once thought. IQ tests tend to be weighted towards mathematics and vocabular skills, with reaction time also a consideration. We now understand that there are far more divisions of Intelligence, and a true analysis needs to take those other aspects into account. For instance, on most standard IQ tests, I score in the high 130's to low 140's. Yet there are just some things I am completely stupid about. The theory of multiple intelligences seems to be more complete than just standard IQ.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence#Human_intelligence" target="_blank">Intelligence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ" target="_blank">Intelligence quotient - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences" target="_blank">Theory of multiple intelligences - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p><p> </p><p> </p><p>So, it's likely that you just aren't wired toward auditory data processing and retention, but are likely much better at other forms. Specifically, there are three different forms of aquiring information, including the aforementioned auditory:</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Auditory</u></strong> - Can hear spoken information or instructions and process it. All they need is to hear a description and they have it.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Visual</u></strong> - Can see information or instruction and process it. Once they see a picture of an object, place, or situation, they've got it.</p><p> </p><p><strong><u>Tactile</u></strong> - Can aquire information or instruction through touch. Once they get their hands on it or take something apart themself, they understand how to put it back together or use it.</p><p> </p><p>Usually this more applies to "learning", but it can be applicable in this situation also.</p><p> </p><p>People tend to have a predominant type, though they can use a combination of all three.</p><p> </p><p>For instance, I'm predominantly visual and tactile (very good at both), but only okay at audible. It has nothing to do with IQ. It's just how my brain is hardwired.</p><p> </p><p>It may be that you're just not very good at audible instruction either, but if it was written down (which can help trigger visualization better) or shown as an illustration, it would make more sense.</p><p> </p><p>There are tests all over the internet to find out what your predominant type is. It's used quite commonly in education settings, and also has found use in managerial situations (I learned about it through the Air Force NCO Academy - the Air Force"s mid to upper Management School).</p><p> </p><p>Talk to your DM and give it a shot.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Here are some links that might help.</p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.businessballs.com/freepdfmaterials/vak_learning_styles_questionnaire.pdf" target="_blank">http://www.businessballs.com/freepdfmaterials/vak_learning_styles_questionnaire.pdf</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://712educators.about.com/od/learningstyles/a/learning_styles.htm" target="_blank">Learning Styles - Understanding and Using Learning Styles</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.businessballs.com/vaklearningstylestest.htm" target="_blank">Free VAK visual auditory kinesthetic learning styles test questionnaire</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://www.businessballs.com/howardgardnermultipleintelligences.htm" target="_blank">multiple intelligences - howard gardners multiple intelligences theory - visual auditory kinesthetic learnings styles VAK model</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://homeworktips.about.com/od/homeworkhelp/a/learningstyle.htm" target="_blank">Learning Styles -- Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Learning</a></p><p> </p><p><a href="http://homeworktips.about.com/od/homeworkhelp/a/lstyleqz.htm" target="_blank">Learning Style Quiz - My Learning Style - Your Best Learning Style</a></p><p> </p><p><img src="http://www.enworld.org/forum/images/smilies/glasses.png" class="smilie" loading="lazy" alt="B-)" title="Glasses B-)" data-shortname="B-)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="El Mahdi, post: 5862018, member: 59506"] I don't think this is about IQ at all. People process information in different ways, and some are better at certain ways than others. Besides, don't worry so much about IQ. Common consensus today is that it's not as good an indicator of Intelligence as we once thought. IQ tests tend to be weighted towards mathematics and vocabular skills, with reaction time also a consideration. We now understand that there are far more divisions of Intelligence, and a true analysis needs to take those other aspects into account. For instance, on most standard IQ tests, I score in the high 130's to low 140's. Yet there are just some things I am completely stupid about. The theory of multiple intelligences seems to be more complete than just standard IQ. [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intelligence#Human_intelligence]Intelligence - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ]Intelligence quotient - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] [url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_multiple_intelligences]Theory of multiple intelligences - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] So, it's likely that you just aren't wired toward auditory data processing and retention, but are likely much better at other forms. Specifically, there are three different forms of aquiring information, including the aforementioned auditory: [B][U]Auditory[/U][/B] - Can hear spoken information or instructions and process it. All they need is to hear a description and they have it. [B][U]Visual[/U][/B] - Can see information or instruction and process it. Once they see a picture of an object, place, or situation, they've got it. [B][U]Tactile[/U][/B] - Can aquire information or instruction through touch. Once they get their hands on it or take something apart themself, they understand how to put it back together or use it. Usually this more applies to "learning", but it can be applicable in this situation also. People tend to have a predominant type, though they can use a combination of all three. For instance, I'm predominantly visual and tactile (very good at both), but only okay at audible. It has nothing to do with IQ. It's just how my brain is hardwired. It may be that you're just not very good at audible instruction either, but if it was written down (which can help trigger visualization better) or shown as an illustration, it would make more sense. There are tests all over the internet to find out what your predominant type is. It's used quite commonly in education settings, and also has found use in managerial situations (I learned about it through the Air Force NCO Academy - the Air Force"s mid to upper Management School). Talk to your DM and give it a shot. Here are some links that might help. [URL]http://www.businessballs.com/freepdfmaterials/vak_learning_styles_questionnaire.pdf[/URL] [url=http://712educators.about.com/od/learningstyles/a/learning_styles.htm]Learning Styles - Understanding and Using Learning Styles[/url] [url=http://www.businessballs.com/vaklearningstylestest.htm]Free VAK visual auditory kinesthetic learning styles test questionnaire[/url] [url=http://www.businessballs.com/howardgardnermultipleintelligences.htm]multiple intelligences - howard gardners multiple intelligences theory - visual auditory kinesthetic learnings styles VAK model[/url] [url=http://homeworktips.about.com/od/homeworkhelp/a/learningstyle.htm]Learning Styles -- Visual, Auditory, and Tactile Learning[/url] [url=http://homeworktips.about.com/od/homeworkhelp/a/lstyleqz.htm]Learning Style Quiz - My Learning Style - Your Best Learning Style[/url] B-) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Comprehension problems
Top