Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Ranger REG" data-source="post: 1940423" data-attributes="member: 533">There was?For me, it was the opposite, being a staunch supporter of the d20 network, to prove that d20 is not just for traditional fantasy genre only. I mean, AEG's Spycraft was released way before WotC's d20 Modern, and to this day still utilize the PHB with no plans to switch to d20 Modern rules.As for Conan RPG OGL status, it's no big deal, even though they could make the product more appealing toward PHB owners by slapping on a d20 label. Then again, they felt that it should deserve its own rulebook.But I can't help but notice that only a minor portion of the PHB customer base understand what d20 is about, and from that portion, only a few would support d20 network (by buying third-party d20-labeled products). At least that's the impression I get from the Wizards' messageboards, who don't even know there are nautical rules or mass combat rules or realm management rules available in the market for use with d20 D&D games.If you ask me, WotC should have pursued a more aggressive marketing plan for d20 by slapping the d20 logo not in the back of the D&D Core Rulebooks but in the front and side-by-side with the D&D logo.That's my 2 coppers.</blockquote>