Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Concentration: combining two effects
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Saeviomagy" data-source="post: 6778938" data-attributes="member: 5890"><p>The only spells that I can think of which fall into that category are short term concentration effects (ie paladin smite spells, true strike and readying a spell), and I think the fix for all of those is to remove concentration from the base spell because it is simply the wrong mechanic for them.</p><p></p><p>Treantmonk subscribes to a school of thought that if you're not using a spell all the time, it's of low value (hence his rating for hold person). Since you only concentrate on a single spell at a time, that means only the best concentration spell at a level gets a good rating.</p><p></p><p>My personal view is that outside of my limited case above, spells are either good or bad and whether they need concentration doesn't meaningfully impact that.</p><p></p><p>Now, sure, you could make an item to concentrate on a spell for a single round for you: but I think that would just add complexity when simply abolishing concentration from those scenarios would be better because it's not appropriate for them.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Saeviomagy, post: 6778938, member: 5890"] The only spells that I can think of which fall into that category are short term concentration effects (ie paladin smite spells, true strike and readying a spell), and I think the fix for all of those is to remove concentration from the base spell because it is simply the wrong mechanic for them. Treantmonk subscribes to a school of thought that if you're not using a spell all the time, it's of low value (hence his rating for hold person). Since you only concentrate on a single spell at a time, that means only the best concentration spell at a level gets a good rating. My personal view is that outside of my limited case above, spells are either good or bad and whether they need concentration doesn't meaningfully impact that. Now, sure, you could make an item to concentrate on a spell for a single round for you: but I think that would just add complexity when simply abolishing concentration from those scenarios would be better because it's not appropriate for them. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Concentration: combining two effects
Top