Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Quickleaf" data-source="post: 7328794" data-attributes="member: 20323">Whoa. That's uncalled for. I'll be blocking you.Look, you're creating meaning for &quot;Argonaut&quot; that has never existed before. For your home campaign, do whatever you like! But if you're hoping to gain broader traction, it is nonsensical because it's your invented association of &quot;Argonaut&quot; to &quot;magic knight person.&quot; No such correlation exists in myth, books, or film. Lots of us are telling you this.My recommendation to do research into the underlying mythical/literary/film sources of the &quot;magic knight person&quot; archetype was coming from a very sincere place, but not only didn't you didn't care to pursue that recommendation, but you completely misconstrued my advice and got personal.In the future, I hope you can engage with constructive criticism on these boards with a more positive outlook, so that other posters have a better experience with you than I have.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Quickleaf, post: 7328794, member: 20323"] Whoa. That's uncalled for. I'll be blocking you. Look, you're creating meaning for "Argonaut" that has never existed before. For your home campaign, do whatever you like! But if you're hoping to gain broader traction, it is nonsensical because it's your invented association of "Argonaut" to "magic knight person." No such correlation exists in myth, books, or film. Lots of us are telling you this. My recommendation to do research into the underlying mythical/literary/film sources of the "magic knight person" archetype was coming from a very sincere place, but not only didn't you didn't care to pursue that recommendation, but you completely misconstrued my advice and got personal. In the future, I hope you can engage with constructive criticism on these boards with a more positive outlook, so that other posters have a better experience with you than I have. [/QUOTE]

Verification