Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="MostlyDm" data-source="post: 6989089" data-attributes="member: 6788973">I'm very much on the fence as far as it granting skills, Tony... I think you may be right that it is too powerful. Tools/languages I'm more flexible about.Also, in my 3.X homebrews, I do away with the predefined skill list entirely and have players make up their own skills, then when using a skill at the table we figure out what stat applies in the particular use case (much like 5e tool proficiencies).&nbsp; This system would likely work well in 5e, but I haven't ported it yet.Also, Tony, could you do me a favor and fix your quote of me? You cut out text in the middle of the quote and didn't signify it with any sort of ellipsis or similar to indicate that you were doing it.&nbsp; I assume my mention of 4e in anything that could be construed as a negative way offended you, so I understand why you cut it.&nbsp; But as it stands right now, it's a misquote.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="MostlyDm, post: 6989089, member: 6788973"] I'm very much on the fence as far as it granting skills, Tony... I think you may be right that it is too powerful. Tools/languages I'm more flexible about. Also, in my 3.X homebrews, I do away with the predefined skill list entirely and have players make up their own skills, then when using a skill at the table we figure out what stat applies in the particular use case (much like 5e tool proficiencies). This system would likely work well in 5e, but I haven't ported it yet. Also, Tony, could you do me a favor and fix your quote of me? You cut out text in the middle of the quote and didn't signify it with any sort of ellipsis or similar to indicate that you were doing it. I assume my mention of 4e in anything that could be construed as a negative way offended you, so I understand why you cut it. But as it stands right now, it's a misquote. [/QUOTE]

Verification