Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Concurrent initiative variant; Everybody declares/Everybody resolves [WAS Simultaneous Initiative]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Ilbranteloth" data-source="post: 7030596" data-attributes="member: 6778044"><p>We base it on the circumstance. We'd like to avoid the "game" of combat and instead allow the rules to adjudicate the actions in the combat. So if circumstances make it reasonable to alter your action, then go right ahead. If that change seems to put you at a disadvantage, then so be it. But I wouldn't want a rule that requires it. </p><p></p><p>So if you're charging across the battlefield at an orc, and your ranger buddy puts an arrow through its throat and drops it, you can alter your charge to attack another orc somewhere more or less in front of you (say, like a 20 or 30 degree arc on either side of your original target). On the other hand, if the only other possible target is an orcish sorcerer on a ridge 90 degrees to your left and at least 150 feet away, then you can (and almost certainly will) change your course of action, but it probably won't resolve this round.</p><p></p><p>Part of the idea for us is to focus on the action, rather than whether you <em>resolve</em> an action in every round. You've taken an action - you charged across the battlefield. You expected to have to clobber the orc you were screaming at, but that turned out to be moot. So you kick the orc in the head as you turn to survey the battlefield and consider your next move.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Ilbranteloth, post: 7030596, member: 6778044"] We base it on the circumstance. We'd like to avoid the "game" of combat and instead allow the rules to adjudicate the actions in the combat. So if circumstances make it reasonable to alter your action, then go right ahead. If that change seems to put you at a disadvantage, then so be it. But I wouldn't want a rule that requires it. So if you're charging across the battlefield at an orc, and your ranger buddy puts an arrow through its throat and drops it, you can alter your charge to attack another orc somewhere more or less in front of you (say, like a 20 or 30 degree arc on either side of your original target). On the other hand, if the only other possible target is an orcish sorcerer on a ridge 90 degrees to your left and at least 150 feet away, then you can (and almost certainly will) change your course of action, but it probably won't resolve this round. Part of the idea for us is to focus on the action, rather than whether you [I]resolve[/I] an action in every round. You've taken an action - you charged across the battlefield. You expected to have to clobber the orc you were screaming at, but that turned out to be moot. So you kick the orc in the head as you turn to survey the battlefield and consider your next move. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Concurrent initiative variant; Everybody declares/Everybody resolves [WAS Simultaneous Initiative]
Top