Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Hussar" data-source="post: 6597170" data-attributes="member: 22779">Like Tony Vargas, I don't.&nbsp; But, the point remains that all the criteria for dissociative mechanics equally applies to Power Attack.It's inconsistent because you claim not to like something for a reason, while at the same time, have no problems with other elements which exhibit exactly the same reasons.&nbsp; I have zero problem with you not liking 4e.&nbsp; I do have a problem with the idea that you don't like 4e because the system is somehow flawed with identical flaws that appear in systems that you apparently do like.Hostility?&nbsp; Hmmm, well, how about the fact that you're trying to tell me that the system I like is somehow inferior even though the systems you like have exactly the same issues.&nbsp; Telling me you don't like 4e?&nbsp; Fantastic.&nbsp; No problems.&nbsp; Telling me that 4e is bad because of criteria which applies equally to the stuff you like?&nbsp; Yeah, you're going to get a bit of hostility.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Hussar, post: 6597170, member: 22779"] Like Tony Vargas, I don't. But, the point remains that all the criteria for dissociative mechanics equally applies to Power Attack. It's inconsistent because you claim not to like something for a reason, while at the same time, have no problems with other elements which exhibit exactly the same reasons. I have zero problem with you not liking 4e. I do have a problem with the idea that you don't like 4e because the system is somehow flawed with identical flaws that appear in systems that you apparently do like. Hostility? Hmmm, well, how about the fact that you're trying to tell me that the system I like is somehow inferior even though the systems you like have exactly the same issues. Telling me you don't like 4e? Fantastic. No problems. Telling me that 4e is bad because of criteria which applies equally to the stuff you like? Yeah, you're going to get a bit of hostility. [/QUOTE]

Verification