Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Confirm or Deny: D&D4e would be going strong had it not been titled D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Erechel" data-source="post: 6597527" data-attributes="member: 6784868"><p>This is a valid position. The rules don't have to break when they are pushed (they are, after all, like physics laws in own our realm). But you will never see me complain about that. I complain about the power creeping factor, about dissociative mechanics that had nothing to do with a story driven game and levels the game to a more powergamist, inverosimile ground, and about static party roles (if you aren't so sure, it's okay, but the actual book says that there are roles to fulfill, and that roles are <em>combat</em> roles: defender, striker, controller, leader; they are actually pretty dissociative, balance-driven, not story-wise party roles). This creates a a lot less story-driven core of the game, as it permeates every game, although many players can claim that they can run a story driven 4th edition game.</p><p></p><p>I will gladly accept balance, "better" mechanics (although you don't already describe at all why you think them that way, although many of us had to put word for word several times why we think that they aren't, or even what powergaming is; if you are a power creep actually it is better for you to play 3rd edition) and change if it leads to a overall better game experience. But, YMMV, I can not see this improving in 4th edition. Not even in 3rd (you won't see me in a Pathfinder table). I surely can in 5th, and it is easy to prove that it is a much more story driven game: backgrounds, personalities with bonds and flaws, the entries in MM, depictions of races and classes, trinkets, and so on and so on (I'm quoting Zizek here). Even it is stated as a modular game, where the control is on the DM side (or table side), and not everything is forced by RAW.</p><p></p><p>Story-driven and mechanics-driven are two different approachs to the game. It is to expect that the two of them being carefully taken account of. The two of them are completely different approaches as how a game must be played, and depict what the heart of the game actually is.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Erechel, post: 6597527, member: 6784868"] This is a valid position. The rules don't have to break when they are pushed (they are, after all, like physics laws in own our realm). But you will never see me complain about that. I complain about the power creeping factor, about dissociative mechanics that had nothing to do with a story driven game and levels the game to a more powergamist, inverosimile ground, and about static party roles (if you aren't so sure, it's okay, but the actual book says that there are roles to fulfill, and that roles are [I]combat[/I] roles: defender, striker, controller, leader; they are actually pretty dissociative, balance-driven, not story-wise party roles). This creates a a lot less story-driven core of the game, as it permeates every game, although many players can claim that they can run a story driven 4th edition game. I will gladly accept balance, "better" mechanics (although you don't already describe at all why you think them that way, although many of us had to put word for word several times why we think that they aren't, or even what powergaming is; if you are a power creep actually it is better for you to play 3rd edition) and change if it leads to a overall better game experience. But, YMMV, I can not see this improving in 4th edition. Not even in 3rd (you won't see me in a Pathfinder table). I surely can in 5th, and it is easy to prove that it is a much more story driven game: backgrounds, personalities with bonds and flaws, the entries in MM, depictions of races and classes, trinkets, and so on and so on (I'm quoting Zizek here). Even it is stated as a modular game, where the control is on the DM side (or table side), and not everything is forced by RAW. Story-driven and mechanics-driven are two different approachs to the game. It is to expect that the two of them being carefully taken account of. The two of them are completely different approaches as how a game must be played, and depict what the heart of the game actually is. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Confirm or Deny: D&D4e would be going strong had it not been titled D&D
Top