Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 6597563"><p>Just a point about things like inspiration, a lot of the people who complained about 4E disrupting their immersion were also not fans of inspiration. For many though, it was clear that stuff like this was more sporadic in 5E when we read the book. It looked like a compromise rather than a doubling down. When I read 5E my impression was "yeah they left some 4E stuff in there I don't like (or things in the spirit of it) but they also took most of the stuff out I didn't like and they replaced it with things I do like. I haven't played 5E yet, so we'll have to see how it runs. On reading through the book a bit, and I haven't done so deeply because I am busy with other systems right now, it looks promising, more like older editions but with a bit of anew spin. It is obvious this was written for the entire fan base though, not just people like me. So I expect there to be stuff in there i don't care for. It is simply a mater of how easy it is to overlook those things where they come up or ignore them.</p></blockquote><p></p>