Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Confirm or Deny: D&D4e would be going strong had it not been titled D&D
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest&nbsp; 85555" data-source="post: 6597792"><p>Certainly we shouldn't be blinded by our dislike of something. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't look for explanations either. I mean I think I am pretty even handed in my treatment of different systems (including 4E). Some just don't appeal to me, and when they don't I find it helpful to try to understand why. Dissociative Mechanics as a concept resonates with me in a lot of cases as an explanation. This isn't like hating a cook and trying to prove all his meals are too salty, it is about realizing you don't care that much for spicy food and knowing you might want to avoid the chef's meals because he uses plenty of crushed red pepper. I think most people who have been critical of 4E here have acknowledged that it is a well designed game. </p><p></p><p>And yes, we certainly could only be hearing the few people making a complaint about the guy being spicy and thinking that represents a majority. But this is a complaint I heard and hear again and again with 4E. Even when people don't specifically use the term dissociative they describe the experience of that disconnection. So I think whatever we call it, there is probably something to this as a source of frustration for many people. Perhaps dissociative mechanic is an oversimplification as a description, but I do think it is pointing to a very real thing people experienced frequently with 4E that they felt they didn't with previous editions (or didn't experience to he same degree at least). </p><p></p><p>Now all that said, we of course could be totally wrong. We are all just individuals making the best judgment we can. But I don't know, maybe rather than accuse people of all kinds of bad intentions and bad reasoning, just say you disagree with their conlcusions and move on. The problem I have with how you've been proceeding in this discussion is you are adding in a moral judgment of people who say they don't like 4E because of dissociativeness that feels wholly unnecessary and provocative.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 85555, post: 6597792"] Certainly we shouldn't be blinded by our dislike of something. But that doesn't mean we shouldn't look for explanations either. I mean I think I am pretty even handed in my treatment of different systems (including 4E). Some just don't appeal to me, and when they don't I find it helpful to try to understand why. Dissociative Mechanics as a concept resonates with me in a lot of cases as an explanation. This isn't like hating a cook and trying to prove all his meals are too salty, it is about realizing you don't care that much for spicy food and knowing you might want to avoid the chef's meals because he uses plenty of crushed red pepper. I think most people who have been critical of 4E here have acknowledged that it is a well designed game. And yes, we certainly could only be hearing the few people making a complaint about the guy being spicy and thinking that represents a majority. But this is a complaint I heard and hear again and again with 4E. Even when people don't specifically use the term dissociative they describe the experience of that disconnection. So I think whatever we call it, there is probably something to this as a source of frustration for many people. Perhaps dissociative mechanic is an oversimplification as a description, but I do think it is pointing to a very real thing people experienced frequently with 4E that they felt they didn't with previous editions (or didn't experience to he same degree at least). Now all that said, we of course could be totally wrong. We are all just individuals making the best judgment we can. But I don't know, maybe rather than accuse people of all kinds of bad intentions and bad reasoning, just say you disagree with their conlcusions and move on. The problem I have with how you've been proceeding in this discussion is you are adding in a moral judgment of people who say they don't like 4E because of dissociativeness that feels wholly unnecessary and provocative. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Confirm or Deny: D&D4e would be going strong had it not been titled D&D
Top