Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Confirmed: Magic items and summoned monster stats in PHB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 4060399" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>No, by all means, 'pick on' me. If you must make a strong argument using someone as an example, pick me, because I want take it personally and go whining to the moderators about how harsh and cruel kennew142 is merely because he disagrees with me strongly and passionately. </p><p></p><p>In fact, I'll see it as a sign of respect. The posters I don't respond to are the ones who in the long run are making the least interesting and least well considered statements. I don't want to have a discussion with someone who is an idiot, and so I don't. The fact that you want to address me specifically is interpretted to me to mean, at worst, "Even though I think you are being an idiot, I don't think you are hopelessly so.", which is as much as you can really expect from someone that is passionately disagreeing with you.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"We removed X because it's not fun", is not an 'innocent' comment. We gotten alot of that from the 4e designers, and it is no more 'innocent' than my statements implying things like, 'If you don't think X is fun, it is because you don't really know what fun is. You like what you know, but you don't know what you like.'</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>And I agree with RC here, it seems unlikely that the game will support more playstyles by removing more options from the game. There has been a consistant pattern to the design philosophy of 4E where if something seems like a problem, the solution has been to just remove it. And as I've been repeatedly saying, it is alot easier to ignore rules and remove rules and remove subsystems you don't like from play, than it is to put all that stuff back in if you do like them. So for example, one of the selling points of 4E is that the monster stat blocks are streamlined to just the things that you need to run combats. Which is fine if the play style you prefer only has monsters doing things in combat. But if you don't prefer that playstyle, then it is much harder to add back in what has been taken out, than it would be to ignore any extra rules and abilities that the monster has that you don't need.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 4060399, member: 4937"] No, by all means, 'pick on' me. If you must make a strong argument using someone as an example, pick me, because I want take it personally and go whining to the moderators about how harsh and cruel kennew142 is merely because he disagrees with me strongly and passionately. In fact, I'll see it as a sign of respect. The posters I don't respond to are the ones who in the long run are making the least interesting and least well considered statements. I don't want to have a discussion with someone who is an idiot, and so I don't. The fact that you want to address me specifically is interpretted to me to mean, at worst, "Even though I think you are being an idiot, I don't think you are hopelessly so.", which is as much as you can really expect from someone that is passionately disagreeing with you. "We removed X because it's not fun", is not an 'innocent' comment. We gotten alot of that from the 4e designers, and it is no more 'innocent' than my statements implying things like, 'If you don't think X is fun, it is because you don't really know what fun is. You like what you know, but you don't know what you like.' And I agree with RC here, it seems unlikely that the game will support more playstyles by removing more options from the game. There has been a consistant pattern to the design philosophy of 4E where if something seems like a problem, the solution has been to just remove it. And as I've been repeatedly saying, it is alot easier to ignore rules and remove rules and remove subsystems you don't like from play, than it is to put all that stuff back in if you do like them. So for example, one of the selling points of 4E is that the monster stat blocks are streamlined to just the things that you need to run combats. Which is fine if the play style you prefer only has monsters doing things in combat. But if you don't prefer that playstyle, then it is much harder to add back in what has been taken out, than it would be to ignore any extra rules and abilities that the monster has that you don't need. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Confirmed: Magic items and summoned monster stats in PHB
Top