Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Confirmed: Magic items and summoned monster stats in PHB
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JohnSnow" data-source="post: 4060831" data-attributes="member: 32164"><p>While that sounds good in theory, it's when the "rubber meets the road" of determining what goes in which books that you run into conflicts.</p><p></p><p>No game can, by definition, accomodate <strong>both</strong> the Gygaxian ideal of "keeping the dispensation of magic items solely in the hands of the DM" and the Third-Edition mindset of "Give the players control over what items their characters get."</p><p></p><p>A choice has to be made. If the vast majority hold to the playstyle of "Players get to decide what magic items their characterts have," then the game should be laid out in such a way as to cater to that majority.</p><p></p><p>In First Edition, most of the resolution rules (like the mechanics for Saving Throws) were not even in the PHB. Second Edition put more and more of those rules in the PHB, and fewer in the DMG. When Third Edition first came out, it had a mini-DMG section and a mini-MM in the back. When combined with the "nearly complete" combat and adventuring rules, <em>you could actually play with just the PHB</em>.</p><p></p><p>As others have pointed out, spells have always been in the PHB, because the <em>players</em> need to know how their spells work. In Third Edition, characters can <em>make</em> magic items. Since those are things <em>players</em> control, why shouldn't they be in the PHB as well?</p><p></p><p>I think the reason the statistics for summoned monsters and alternate forms will be in the PHB is so that the player can have ready access to the statistics so that he can still run his own character. That's all.</p><p></p><p>Frankly, I don't see what the big deal is. All they're saying is: "Sorry, if you're one of those DMs who want to control what magic items your PCs get, you're in the minority. Of course, as always, you're the DM, and it's your right to change the rules."</p><p></p><p>As much as these DMs say "my players never complain," I think a lot of them actually DO have players who feel differently and they're terrified that they won't be able to maintain their authority without the layout of the game rules to back them up.</p><p></p><p>What's so hard about saying: "I don't care WHAT the PHB says - in my campaign, you can't buy magic items and <em>that's final.</em>"</p><p></p><p>Do you just have trouble saying "No" to your players?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JohnSnow, post: 4060831, member: 32164"] While that sounds good in theory, it's when the "rubber meets the road" of determining what goes in which books that you run into conflicts. No game can, by definition, accomodate [b]both[/b] the Gygaxian ideal of "keeping the dispensation of magic items solely in the hands of the DM" and the Third-Edition mindset of "Give the players control over what items their characters get." A choice has to be made. If the vast majority hold to the playstyle of "Players get to decide what magic items their characterts have," then the game should be laid out in such a way as to cater to that majority. In First Edition, most of the resolution rules (like the mechanics for Saving Throws) were not even in the PHB. Second Edition put more and more of those rules in the PHB, and fewer in the DMG. When Third Edition first came out, it had a mini-DMG section and a mini-MM in the back. When combined with the "nearly complete" combat and adventuring rules, [i]you could actually play with just the PHB[/i]. As others have pointed out, spells have always been in the PHB, because the [i]players[/i] need to know how their spells work. In Third Edition, characters can [i]make[/i] magic items. Since those are things [i]players[/i] control, why shouldn't they be in the PHB as well? I think the reason the statistics for summoned monsters and alternate forms will be in the PHB is so that the player can have ready access to the statistics so that he can still run his own character. That's all. Frankly, I don't see what the big deal is. All they're saying is: "Sorry, if you're one of those DMs who want to control what magic items your PCs get, you're in the minority. Of course, as always, you're the DM, and it's your right to change the rules." As much as these DMs say "my players never complain," I think a lot of them actually DO have players who feel differently and they're terrified that they won't be able to maintain their authority without the layout of the game rules to back them up. What's so hard about saying: "I don't care WHAT the PHB says - in my campaign, you can't buy magic items and [i]that's final.[/i]" Do you just have trouble saying "No" to your players? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Confirmed: Magic items and summoned monster stats in PHB
Top