Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Confusion in Monk's Belt
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Slaved" data-source="post: 3461388" data-attributes="member: 43358"><p>I am still a little lost on the ambiguity part. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I do not see how, but lets drop it ok?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>If you take the monster as presented in the manual and change it in some way this can effect its challenge rating.</p><p></p><p>Some of these effects are better defined than others though. Some of them are not done very well even while defined.</p><p></p><p>If you put a creature in a situation advantageous to it you change the amount of experience that you should award. The challenge rating is not actually changed but the challenge itself was.</p><p></p><p>But if you change the creature itself then it is no longer a certainty that its new abilities leave its actual challenge rating the same.</p><p></p><p>If you were to take a hill giant, for example, and give it better armor and some magical equipment then you could easily make the challenge for fighting it much harder. It could suddenly be several points higher in the armor class department and possibly do even more damage than it does not. The same as if you had just suddenly given it +4 to all of its statistics. The creature is no longer the same as the one in the manual and so the challenge rating given is no longer appropriate.</p><p></p><p>No, challenge rating is not an exact science. It has a lot of issues in fact.</p><p></p><p>But I would still argue that by changing the creature as presented then you have a very good chance of changing its challenge rating.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>This looks to me like you are saying that you change monsters to be better but that does not actually make them a tougher challenge?</p><p></p><p>You are not actually saying that right? If you are then I can only say that I disagree with your conclusion.</p><p></p><p>If you change a creatures skill focus (profession (dairy farmer)) into melee weapon mastery, since it happens to qualify for it somehow, you have definately changed the strength of that creature! We can change that hill giant around to make him a whirlwind master who trips everyone who comes within 20 feet as well, all it takes is a little boost to intelligence and changing his feats around. I would imagine that its challenge rating would be different however.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Slaved, post: 3461388, member: 43358"] I am still a little lost on the ambiguity part. :( I do not see how, but lets drop it ok? If you take the monster as presented in the manual and change it in some way this can effect its challenge rating. Some of these effects are better defined than others though. Some of them are not done very well even while defined. If you put a creature in a situation advantageous to it you change the amount of experience that you should award. The challenge rating is not actually changed but the challenge itself was. But if you change the creature itself then it is no longer a certainty that its new abilities leave its actual challenge rating the same. If you were to take a hill giant, for example, and give it better armor and some magical equipment then you could easily make the challenge for fighting it much harder. It could suddenly be several points higher in the armor class department and possibly do even more damage than it does not. The same as if you had just suddenly given it +4 to all of its statistics. The creature is no longer the same as the one in the manual and so the challenge rating given is no longer appropriate. No, challenge rating is not an exact science. It has a lot of issues in fact. But I would still argue that by changing the creature as presented then you have a very good chance of changing its challenge rating. This looks to me like you are saying that you change monsters to be better but that does not actually make them a tougher challenge? You are not actually saying that right? If you are then I can only say that I disagree with your conclusion. If you change a creatures skill focus (profession (dairy farmer)) into melee weapon mastery, since it happens to qualify for it somehow, you have definately changed the strength of that creature! We can change that hill giant around to make him a whirlwind master who trips everyone who comes within 20 feet as well, all it takes is a little boost to intelligence and changing his feats around. I would imagine that its challenge rating would be different however. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Confusion in Monk's Belt
Top