Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Clint_L" data-source="post: 8884475" data-attributes="member: 7035894">My rulings would be:1. They can't fail the save because they don't have to make a save against fear within 10' of the paladin, as they are immune to fear in those circumstances. Creatures that are immune to an effect do not roll saves against it, period. If they are subsequently no longer in that radius, they would then no longer be immune and have to roll saves as required. TLDR: situation 1 shouldn't happen.2. This is more interesting, as it depends on how we interpret the words &quot;can't be frightened.&quot; Does this mean &quot;cannot start being frightened but can continue to be frightened if already in that condition&quot; or &quot;can never be in a state of fear&quot;? To me the plain wording of the text suggests they would stop being frightened while within 10', but the condition would return outside of that radius.3. Yes. They are immune to fear and so do not have to roll a save against it, per 1. This would be a clever combination of the spell and the aura.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Clint_L, post: 8884475, member: 7035894"] My rulings would be: 1. They can't fail the save because they don't have to make a save against fear within 10' of the paladin, as they are immune to fear in those circumstances. Creatures that are immune to an effect do not roll saves against it, period. If they are subsequently no longer in that radius, they would then no longer be immune and have to roll saves as required. TLDR: situation 1 shouldn't happen. 2. This is more interesting, as it depends on how we interpret the words "can't be frightened." Does this mean "cannot [I]start[/I] being frightened but can continue to be frightened if already in that condition" or "can never be in a state of fear"? To me the plain wording of the text suggests they would stop being frightened while within 10', but the condition would return outside of that radius. 3. Yes. They are immune to fear and so do not have to roll a save against it, per 1. This would be a clever combination of the spell and the aura. [/QUOTE]

Verification