Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Campbell" data-source="post: 7800464" data-attributes="member: 16586">I think it's a mistake to analyze a way to play the game only in terms of the resultant fiction. Even if you had two groups who played through the same scenario and got the same results using entirely different methods their experience of playing the game would be so fundamentally different that you really could not compare the types of fun they were having. For me the way I tend to run games is fun because I have no way of knowing how it is going to come out, there is real shared tension at the table, and because I get to find out through play who these characters really are when push comes to shove. Even if I could experience the same or better fiction through other methods it would not be worth it for me. The actual experience of playing is what matters.I also feel like making decisions on the basis of Fear of Missing Out never really results in good decisions.</blockquote>