Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Consequences of playing "EVIL" races
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Celebrim" data-source="post: 7924233" data-attributes="member: 4937"><p>[USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] With all due respect, the questions you are addressing to me are pretty much exactly the questions I am addressing to the other poster. </p><p></p><p>The discomfort you apparently feel with the assertions I'm making parallels rather strongly the discomfort I'm feeling with [USER=7015512]@shawnhcorey[/USER] assertions. He said for example that he doesn't play games with alignment because "Labeling someone for any reason is wrong." That's not a claim of subjective experience, but a normative claim. It would appear to apply to games other than the ones he participates him. Likewise, you seem to be worried that I'm positioning myself as "the arbiter of rationality". Leaving aside that everyone is an arbiter of rationality so if was positioning myself to do that it wouldn't be unusual, I'm not actually the person who introduced the issue into this discussion. The other poster defended his assertion by suggesting the contrary required "unscientific thinking". </p><p></p><p>Just as you seem to want clarification of my position, I would like clarification from the original poster.</p><p></p><p>As for your question, it should be well known to you that I don't insist that two rational persons will always come to the same conclusion. That is not actually the point of contention. The question is, given a body of evidence, is every conclusion rational. I left open right from the start that there would be rational reasons to decide that you didn't want to play a game with alignment. I don't have a particular problem with assertions like, "Alignment isn't right for me. In games I've played, it hasn't worked out, and these are the reasons why."</p><p></p><p>But again, that isn't what the poster asserted. For each of the for bullet points he made, I suggested that there was a logical problem with the assertion. Neither you nor him have offered to disagree with my points.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Celebrim, post: 7924233, member: 4937"] [USER=177]@Umbran[/USER] With all due respect, the questions you are addressing to me are pretty much exactly the questions I am addressing to the other poster. The discomfort you apparently feel with the assertions I'm making parallels rather strongly the discomfort I'm feeling with [USER=7015512]@shawnhcorey[/USER] assertions. He said for example that he doesn't play games with alignment because "Labeling someone for any reason is wrong." That's not a claim of subjective experience, but a normative claim. It would appear to apply to games other than the ones he participates him. Likewise, you seem to be worried that I'm positioning myself as "the arbiter of rationality". Leaving aside that everyone is an arbiter of rationality so if was positioning myself to do that it wouldn't be unusual, I'm not actually the person who introduced the issue into this discussion. The other poster defended his assertion by suggesting the contrary required "unscientific thinking". Just as you seem to want clarification of my position, I would like clarification from the original poster. As for your question, it should be well known to you that I don't insist that two rational persons will always come to the same conclusion. That is not actually the point of contention. The question is, given a body of evidence, is every conclusion rational. I left open right from the start that there would be rational reasons to decide that you didn't want to play a game with alignment. I don't have a particular problem with assertions like, "Alignment isn't right for me. In games I've played, it hasn't worked out, and these are the reasons why." But again, that isn't what the poster asserted. For each of the for bullet points he made, I suggested that there was a logical problem with the assertion. Neither you nor him have offered to disagree with my points. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Consequences of playing "EVIL" races
Top