Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="RUMBLETiGER" data-source="post: 6156465" data-attributes="member: 6674868">Hot Dog!&nbsp; This is the exactly the sort of obscure-but-perfect suggestion I was hoping somebody could pull up.&nbsp; It took me a while to go thru the book and find this, even after you told me what I was looking for.&nbsp; The DM runs a sandbox campaign, I'll have to ask if it's possible to go this route, but this was the kind of suggestion I was looking for.&nbsp; It would stand to reason that a higher-powered version of a spell requirement should meet the requirement.&nbsp;The reason I'd not re-write it is is because I'm a fan of RAW, however unbalanced and/or obscure the rule is.&nbsp; I hold the (occasionally disproven) belief that 3.5 contains enough ideas that one should be able to craft any concept with the right combination of book-provided sources.&nbsp; That said, I'd accept it if my DM made the offer to tweak the requirements.&nbsp; Just because I like the rules doesn't mean I'd not accept a change in my favor. Above all I honor the rules that DMs get final say and that the game should be fun for all.Indeed, this would be quite the ridiculous build, wouldn't it?</blockquote>

[QUOTE="RUMBLETiGER, post: 6156465, member: 6674868"] Hot Dog! This is the exactly the sort of obscure-but-perfect suggestion I was hoping somebody could pull up. It took me a while to go thru the book and find this, even after you told me what I was looking for. The DM runs a sandbox campaign, I'll have to ask if it's possible to go this route, but this was the kind of suggestion I was looking for. It would stand to reason that a higher-powered version of a spell requirement should meet the requirement. The reason I'd not re-write it is is because I'm a fan of RAW, however unbalanced and/or obscure the rule is. I hold the (occasionally disproven) belief that 3.5 contains enough ideas that one should be able to craft any concept with the right combination of book-provided sources. That said, I'd accept it if my DM made the offer to tweak the requirements. Just because I like the rules doesn't mean I'd not accept a change in my favor. Above all I honor the rules that DMs get final say and that the game should be fun for all. Indeed, this would be quite the ridiculous build, wouldn't it? [/QUOTE]

Verification