Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Considering "taking the 5th" (Edition); questions for those more experienced.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Blackbird71" data-source="post: 6593727" data-attributes="member: 6794081"><p>Bards as full casters may be a problem - I've been having enough trouble wedging them into the setting as partial casters.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yes, I greatly enjoyed 2E; although to be fair, it was rare that my experience involved much of anything beyond the core books (for quite a while it was just the PHB and DMG; not even a Monstrous Manual/Compendium). I attribute much of my lack of dislike for the edition to this, as it seems like a lot of the problems with 2E arose from the mass of additional material tacked on over the years. I've honestly considered going back to 2E for my planned campaign; it's been a few years, but it's familiar enough that I feel I have a good idea on how to make it work.</p><p></p><p>Also, unless you are counting Pathfinder, I never actually played 3.5 tabletop; just in computer games where a lot of the number crunching was taken care of, so I don't know how much that counts. Still, PF has it's share of excessive math. Personally, I don't mind the math too much; I've always been pretty good with running numbers in my head (probably also why I never had an issue with Thac0). But I have seen it affect others at the table, and I recognize that it can significantly slow a game.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>At least in 2E, rangers gained casting at a high enough level that in most of our games, it rarely came into play, and the class may as well have been non-magical for all intents and purposes (as I recall, in those early years the highest any of our games ever got was ~level 12-13, and there were no rangers in that particular party). <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue :p" data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /></p><p></p><p>Again, there have been a lot of wonderfully helpful responses, and I have to thank everyone for their opinions and information. I do have to say that you've convinced me to try out 5th. I'm not exactly anxious to buy up the books right away, but I may see what I can do with the PDFs, or maybe pick up the starter kit (~$12 on Amazon right now; hard to say no to that price). I still have some concerns, but we'll see what happens.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Blackbird71, post: 6593727, member: 6794081"] Bards as full casters may be a problem - I've been having enough trouble wedging them into the setting as partial casters. Yes, I greatly enjoyed 2E; although to be fair, it was rare that my experience involved much of anything beyond the core books (for quite a while it was just the PHB and DMG; not even a Monstrous Manual/Compendium). I attribute much of my lack of dislike for the edition to this, as it seems like a lot of the problems with 2E arose from the mass of additional material tacked on over the years. I've honestly considered going back to 2E for my planned campaign; it's been a few years, but it's familiar enough that I feel I have a good idea on how to make it work. Also, unless you are counting Pathfinder, I never actually played 3.5 tabletop; just in computer games where a lot of the number crunching was taken care of, so I don't know how much that counts. Still, PF has it's share of excessive math. Personally, I don't mind the math too much; I've always been pretty good with running numbers in my head (probably also why I never had an issue with Thac0). But I have seen it affect others at the table, and I recognize that it can significantly slow a game. At least in 2E, rangers gained casting at a high enough level that in most of our games, it rarely came into play, and the class may as well have been non-magical for all intents and purposes (as I recall, in those early years the highest any of our games ever got was ~level 12-13, and there were no rangers in that particular party). :p Again, there have been a lot of wonderfully helpful responses, and I have to thank everyone for their opinions and information. I do have to say that you've convinced me to try out 5th. I'm not exactly anxious to buy up the books right away, but I may see what I can do with the PDFs, or maybe pick up the starter kit (~$12 on Amazon right now; hard to say no to that price). I still have some concerns, but we'll see what happens. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Considering "taking the 5th" (Edition); questions for those more experienced.
Top