Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Enchanted Trinkets Complete--a hardcover book containing over 500 magic items for your D&D games!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Constrict Damage
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Gyr" data-source="post: 904657" data-attributes="member: 12094"><p>Mistwell: Actually, not quite right. Creature's take the -20 if they themselves do not want to be grappled.</p><p></p><p>If they choose to let themselves in turn be grappled, then they can still use their natural attacks (only) against the victim they're grappling with, conducted as normal attacks with normal AC but do not constrict. Alternately, they can choose to make grapple checks against said victim, which bypass normal AC and DO constrict.</p><p></p><p>If the monster chooses the -20 option, then it is not considered grappled and is free to use it's natural attacks on OTHER enemies.</p><p></p><p> This is indeed what the FAQ says, but it is creates problems...look at such creatures as the Monstrous Colossal Scorpion which has improved grab and 64 HD...that's a ridiculous number of iterative grapple checks. IIRC, there has been a sage ruling somewhere that creatures can make no more grapple checks than they have natural attacks in their routines. Unfortunately, I have no reference for it <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":(" title="Frown :(" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":(" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Gyr, post: 904657, member: 12094"] Mistwell: Actually, not quite right. Creature's take the -20 if they themselves do not want to be grappled. If they choose to let themselves in turn be grappled, then they can still use their natural attacks (only) against the victim they're grappling with, conducted as normal attacks with normal AC but do not constrict. Alternately, they can choose to make grapple checks against said victim, which bypass normal AC and DO constrict. If the monster chooses the -20 option, then it is not considered grappled and is free to use it's natural attacks on OTHER enemies. This is indeed what the FAQ says, but it is creates problems...look at such creatures as the Monstrous Colossal Scorpion which has improved grab and 64 HD...that's a ridiculous number of iterative grapple checks. IIRC, there has been a sage ruling somewhere that creatures can make no more grapple checks than they have natural attacks in their routines. Unfortunately, I have no reference for it :( [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Constrict Damage
Top