Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="GruTheWanderer" data-source="post: 661078" data-attributes="member: 3119">I agree that we either need to swap the ranger feats/spells or swap the fighter skills.Modified Ranger: Favored Enemy; 4 skill points; Track and two other feats at 1st level; Feats at 4, 8, 11, 14 (replacing spell levels)Fighter: Heavy Armor; 2 skill points; One feat at 1st level; Feats at every even levelThe ranger ends up with seven feats and 92 skill points.  The fighter ends up with eleven feats and 46 skill points.  Two of the feats should be limited to when the ranger is in light armor.At 5th level the ranger would have four feats and 28 skill points.  The fighter would have three feats and 14 skill points.  Yeah, I'm still not convinced the ranger is necessary.Here's another option.  The fighters in the party could each choose to use either fighter, barbarian, paladin, or ranger skill sets.  They would get the same number of skill points (4).  Thus Sturm could have more courtly skills, while Tanis and Riverwind have more wilderness skills.  Flint and Caramon might be fine with the standard fighter choices (although, as I recall, Flint didn't like riding or swimming, so he must have put a lot into Craft).</blockquote>