Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Contemporary Simulationist TTRPGs [+]
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Deset Gled" data-source="post: 9778141" data-attributes="member: 7808"><p>To start, I will say that I am not an expert on FKR. That being said, I disagree with this on two points.</p><p></p><p>First, I don't think it's accurate to say that FKR has "hidden" rules. That implies some level of misdirection or deception. IMNSHO, FKR is best described as being based on trust: trust between the players, trust in the referee, trust in the game. The idea that there are parts of the game that are "hidden" seems antithetical to that premise. That a referee may need to come up with an ad hoc ruling to an unexpected scenario is not a "fail" state, it is entire reason for the referee to exist in the first place. Additionally, I don't think that two FKR referees could be expected to make two identical rulings, because the defualt assumption is that two completely identical scenarios should not exist.</p><p></p><p>Second, FKR is not inherently "rules light". The baseline assumption is that the players agree to the priorities of the game (i.e. world, narrative, etc) as well as the authority of the referee. The players need to know and agree to the rules, and trust the other players and referee to know them as well. In a majority of FKR games, the rules are kept intentionally light and simple to promote the other priorities of the game. However, there is no inherent need for the rules to be light, only that they are known and agreed to. You could, theoretically, play FKR with D&D 3e, the Battletech wargame rules, or the Arkham Horror board game. As long as the players understood those rules and agreed to them. Now, this is not commonly done. Largely because those rules don't translate to the other priorities of the game. Partially because it tacitly assumes a level of rules mastery that most players won't have. And, most generally, because people playing FKR tend to not want higher complexity rules. But none of that means that "rules heavy" FKR doesn't exist, just that it's not common.</p><p></p><p>To sum all that up: FKR has an extremely high correlation with rules-light play, but there is no causation that requires it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Deset Gled, post: 9778141, member: 7808"] To start, I will say that I am not an expert on FKR. That being said, I disagree with this on two points. First, I don't think it's accurate to say that FKR has "hidden" rules. That implies some level of misdirection or deception. IMNSHO, FKR is best described as being based on trust: trust between the players, trust in the referee, trust in the game. The idea that there are parts of the game that are "hidden" seems antithetical to that premise. That a referee may need to come up with an ad hoc ruling to an unexpected scenario is not a "fail" state, it is entire reason for the referee to exist in the first place. Additionally, I don't think that two FKR referees could be expected to make two identical rulings, because the defualt assumption is that two completely identical scenarios should not exist. Second, FKR is not inherently "rules light". The baseline assumption is that the players agree to the priorities of the game (i.e. world, narrative, etc) as well as the authority of the referee. The players need to know and agree to the rules, and trust the other players and referee to know them as well. In a majority of FKR games, the rules are kept intentionally light and simple to promote the other priorities of the game. However, there is no inherent need for the rules to be light, only that they are known and agreed to. You could, theoretically, play FKR with D&D 3e, the Battletech wargame rules, or the Arkham Horror board game. As long as the players understood those rules and agreed to them. Now, this is not commonly done. Largely because those rules don't translate to the other priorities of the game. Partially because it tacitly assumes a level of rules mastery that most players won't have. And, most generally, because people playing FKR tend to not want higher complexity rules. But none of that means that "rules heavy" FKR doesn't exist, just that it's not common. To sum all that up: FKR has an extremely high correlation with rules-light play, but there is no causation that requires it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*TTRPGs General
Contemporary Simulationist TTRPGs [+]
Top