Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Rocket your D&D 5E and Level Up: Advanced 5E games into space! Alpha Star Magazine Is Launching... Right Now!
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Conversionalizing
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Jer" data-source="post: 4263495" data-attributes="member: 19857"><p>Meanwhile, my current group has decided that our campaign is pretty much impossible to convert right now because 3 of the five characters are a Druid (whose concept is centered on shapeshifting), a Monk, and a Barbarian. The Sorcerer/Rogue would probably be easy to convert - other than the "reality shift" that would turn him from a hopelessly incompetent character into a fairly competent one under 4e <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":)" /> - and the Cleric could move over directly. We might even be able to tweak up a Fighter to get a decent "in spirit" conversion of the Barbarian. But in the end we'd have to probably write up at least 2 new classes to move over - 2 classes that will probably be showing up "officially" within the next year anyway, I might add - and we've decided it isn't worth it.</p><p></p><p>(Also - the tactics of combat are different enough that as a DM I want to start at level 1 for my first campaign anyway - this is the first new edition of D&D that I've seen since I started playing the game in the 80's that makes me think I want to start from the "ground up" to actually learn the game, rather than converting an old campaign over.)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Eh. I recall this question coming up on the podcasts and Dave Noonan pretty much gave the exact spiel you give above - you can do it if you don't expect to have a mathematical conversion and you worry about carrying the characters over "in spirit" instead of directly in form. I think I've seen similar postings from mearls and from keith baker, IIRC. </p><p></p><p></p><p>IMO, I think they're right to set low expectations for this - any party made up of even vaguely "nonstandard" core classed characters is going to be tough to convert right out the gate - like I said, even my party with classes entirely from the 3e core rulebook would be more trouble to convert than it's really worth, so I can't imagine what it would be like if I were contemplating switching a party over that contained a Ninja, or a Favored Soul, or a Swashbuckler or any other of the splatclasses. Better to lower expectations and let the lucky few who are easily able to make the conversion be pleasantly surprised than to raise expectations and have a larger chunk of gamers angry because they were "promised" something that wasn't delivered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Jer, post: 4263495, member: 19857"] Meanwhile, my current group has decided that our campaign is pretty much impossible to convert right now because 3 of the five characters are a Druid (whose concept is centered on shapeshifting), a Monk, and a Barbarian. The Sorcerer/Rogue would probably be easy to convert - other than the "reality shift" that would turn him from a hopelessly incompetent character into a fairly competent one under 4e :) - and the Cleric could move over directly. We might even be able to tweak up a Fighter to get a decent "in spirit" conversion of the Barbarian. But in the end we'd have to probably write up at least 2 new classes to move over - 2 classes that will probably be showing up "officially" within the next year anyway, I might add - and we've decided it isn't worth it. (Also - the tactics of combat are different enough that as a DM I want to start at level 1 for my first campaign anyway - this is the first new edition of D&D that I've seen since I started playing the game in the 80's that makes me think I want to start from the "ground up" to actually learn the game, rather than converting an old campaign over.) Eh. I recall this question coming up on the podcasts and Dave Noonan pretty much gave the exact spiel you give above - you can do it if you don't expect to have a mathematical conversion and you worry about carrying the characters over "in spirit" instead of directly in form. I think I've seen similar postings from mearls and from keith baker, IIRC. IMO, I think they're right to set low expectations for this - any party made up of even vaguely "nonstandard" core classed characters is going to be tough to convert right out the gate - like I said, even my party with classes entirely from the 3e core rulebook would be more trouble to convert than it's really worth, so I can't imagine what it would be like if I were contemplating switching a party over that contained a Ninja, or a Favored Soul, or a Swashbuckler or any other of the splatclasses. Better to lower expectations and let the lucky few who are easily able to make the conversion be pleasantly surprised than to raise expectations and have a larger chunk of gamers angry because they were "promised" something that wasn't delivered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Conversionalizing
Top