Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Hosted Forums
Creature Catalog Forums
General Monster Talk
Converting Creatures from Other Campaign Settings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cleon" data-source="post: 6980078" data-attributes="member: 57383"><p>Updating <a href="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?p=6908127#post6908127" target="_blank"><strong>Wooden Juggernaut Working Draft</strong></a>.</p><p></p><p>While doing so I fixed an error in the Grapple which should be +21 rather than +19. (BAB +3 plus Str +10 plus Size +8)</p><p> </p><p></p><p></p><p>I'd be more inclined to make it CL 9th and DC 15. Making it DC 17 seems too high considering that's the DC of a Stone Golem, which has a significantly higher CR.</p><p></p><p>Speaking of Stone Golems, a Greater Stone Golem costs 105,000 gp to manufacture compared to the 50,000 gp of the base model. That's 55,000 gp more for one size category larger and 28 extra HD and a Challenge Rating 5 levels higher.</p><p></p><p>A Greater Stone Golem is that much better for an additional 55,000 gp then presumably a "max advanced" Wooden Juggernaut ought to be cheaper. Your proposed formula would make a Colossal 20 HD Wooden Juggernaut cost 65,000 gp which seems too high (+15,000 for the HD and +50,000 for the two size increases).</p><p></p><p>Reducing the price of the size increased seems the easiest solution. If we make it +5,000 for the first increase and +10,000 for the second that would make the total +30,000 gp for a Colossal Wooden Juggernaut.</p><p></p><p>Even that might be a bit too high. It might be easier deciding how much the "Greater Wooden Juggernaut" ought to cost and then back-tracking.</p><p></p><p>i.e. if the price of a 20 HD wooden juggernaut was, say, 32,000 gp that'd be 17,000 gp more than the base construct price and we could break it down as 600 gp per HD (total +9,000 gp) plus 3,000 gp for Gargantuan size and 5,000 gp for Colossal size.</p><p></p><p>It'd be a relatively simple matter to tweak those numbers to produce a different final price.</p><p></p><p>Which reminds me, we should also say what portion of the increased price is increased material cost. Presumably a Colossal wooden construct will require more wood to build than a Huge one.</p><p></p><p>The easiest option is to just ignore it, but the Greater Stone Golem's cost & price indicate that its materials cost 2,000 gp more than the standard model so I'm thinking maybe we ought to include it. Perhaps 1,000 gp of the Gargantuan size's 3,000 gp is extra material and 2,000 gp of the Colossal size's 5,000 gp?</p><p></p><p>Alternatively, we could make it some proportion of the price of the HD and/or size increase - maybe 10% of the HD price (so +60 gp of materials per HD) and 20% of the size price (so +600 gp of materials for Gargantuan and +1000 gp of materials for Colossal).</p><p></p><p>Any preferences?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cleon, post: 6980078, member: 57383"] Updating [URL="http://www.enworld.org/forum/showthread.php?p=6908127#post6908127"][B]Wooden Juggernaut Working Draft[/B][/URL]. While doing so I fixed an error in the Grapple which should be +21 rather than +19. (BAB +3 plus Str +10 plus Size +8) I'd be more inclined to make it CL 9th and DC 15. Making it DC 17 seems too high considering that's the DC of a Stone Golem, which has a significantly higher CR. Speaking of Stone Golems, a Greater Stone Golem costs 105,000 gp to manufacture compared to the 50,000 gp of the base model. That's 55,000 gp more for one size category larger and 28 extra HD and a Challenge Rating 5 levels higher. A Greater Stone Golem is that much better for an additional 55,000 gp then presumably a "max advanced" Wooden Juggernaut ought to be cheaper. Your proposed formula would make a Colossal 20 HD Wooden Juggernaut cost 65,000 gp which seems too high (+15,000 for the HD and +50,000 for the two size increases). Reducing the price of the size increased seems the easiest solution. If we make it +5,000 for the first increase and +10,000 for the second that would make the total +30,000 gp for a Colossal Wooden Juggernaut. Even that might be a bit too high. It might be easier deciding how much the "Greater Wooden Juggernaut" ought to cost and then back-tracking. i.e. if the price of a 20 HD wooden juggernaut was, say, 32,000 gp that'd be 17,000 gp more than the base construct price and we could break it down as 600 gp per HD (total +9,000 gp) plus 3,000 gp for Gargantuan size and 5,000 gp for Colossal size. It'd be a relatively simple matter to tweak those numbers to produce a different final price. Which reminds me, we should also say what portion of the increased price is increased material cost. Presumably a Colossal wooden construct will require more wood to build than a Huge one. The easiest option is to just ignore it, but the Greater Stone Golem's cost & price indicate that its materials cost 2,000 gp more than the standard model so I'm thinking maybe we ought to include it. Perhaps 1,000 gp of the Gargantuan size's 3,000 gp is extra material and 2,000 gp of the Colossal size's 5,000 gp? Alternatively, we could make it some proportion of the price of the HD and/or size increase - maybe 10% of the HD price (so +60 gp of materials per HD) and 20% of the size price (so +600 gp of materials for Gargantuan and +1000 gp of materials for Colossal). Any preferences? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Hosted Forums
Creature Catalog Forums
General Monster Talk
Converting Creatures from Other Campaign Settings
Top