Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Hosted Forums
Creature Catalog Forums
General Monster Talk
Converting Creatures from Other Campaign Settings
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cleon" data-source="post: 8303843" data-attributes="member: 57383"><p>Updating the <a href="https://enworld.org/index.php?posts/8061974" target="_blank"><strong>Desert Giant Working Draft</strong></a>.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Unsurprisingly I agree with Challenge Rating 7 for the basic desert giant, but CR 8 is too low for a sand-shifter.</p><p></p><p>Consider, each of the petrified ancestors is CR 7 and on average a sand-shifter can summon four of them. On paper that's five CR 7 opponents which the Encounter Number table says is Encounter Level 12! However, since the sand-shifter is the "load bearing boss" who maintains the ancestor's presence on this plane, knocking them out will cause the four sand-shifted opponents to vanish. I'd eyeball it as around Encounter Level 10.</p><p></p><p>So maybe we should make it Encounter Number based?</p><p></p><p>Let's see, if we assume that "vanishing when the sand-shifter falls" is worth a -1 Encounter Level Adjustment, then the standard Encounter Numbers table would expand to something like:</p><p></p><table style='width: 100%'><tr><td><strong>Encounter Level <br /> (including sand-shifter)</strong></td><td><strong>Summoned <br /> Creatures</strong></td></tr><tr><td>EL 7</td><td>1 petrified ancestor <strong>or</strong><br /> 5-6 stony steed</td></tr><tr><td>EL 8</td><td>2 petrified ancestors <strong>or</strong><br /> 7-9 stony steeds</td></tr><tr><td>EL 9</td><td>3 petrified ancestors <strong>or</strong><br /> 10-12 stony steeds</td></tr><tr><td>EL 10</td><td>4 petrified ancestors <strong>or</strong><br /> <span style="color: red">13-18 stony steeds*</span></td></tr><tr><td>EL 11</td><td>5 or 6 petrified ancestors <strong>or</strong><br /> <span style="color: red">19-24 stony steeds*</span></td></tr></table><p>* The encounter numbers table maxes out at 10-12, since mobs of low CR opponents are pretty worthless in 3.5 edition.</p><p></p><p>So I think I'd add the following to the Sand-Shifters entry…</p><p></p><p><em>Sand-Shifter Encounters:</em> An adult sand-shifter is Challenge Rating 7 and an immature sand-shifter is Challenge Rating 5 (or CR 4 if Medium sized). If the sand-shifter has used sand-shifting its Encounter Level increases depending on how many creatures it summons: <strong>EL 8</strong> for two petrified ancestors, 9 stony steeds, or one ancestor plus 5-6 steeds; <strong>EL 9</strong> for three petrified ancestors, 10-12 stony steeds, two ancestors plus 5-6 steeds, or one ancestor plus 7–12 steeds; <strong>EL 10</strong> for four petrified ancestors, 13-18 stony steeds, three ancestors plus 5-6 steeds, or two ancestor plus 7-12 steeds; and finally <strong>EL 11</strong> for five or six petrified ancestors, 19-24 stony steeds, or three ancestors plus 7-12 steeds.</p><p></p><p>No, I think that's too messy. I can make that simpler.</p><p></p><p>How's this:</p><p></p><p><em>Sand-Shifter Encounter Groups:</em> An adult sand-shifter is Challenge Rating 7 while immature sand-shifters are CR 5 (Large) or CR 4 (Medium).</p><p></p><p>If a sand-shifter has summoned creatures to the desert giant's aid, include the petrified ancestors and stony steeds when calculating a group's Encounter Numbers (i.e. three desert giants plus four petrified ancestors is seven CR 7 creatures for an Encounter Level of 13). Impose a –1 or –2 penalty to the EL if there's a significant proportion of petrified ancestors and stony steeds and the sand-shifter is part of the encounter, since the shifting-sand creatures will vanish if their summoner loses consciousness. For example, a CR 7 desert giant plus a CR 5 immature sand-shifter and ten to twelve CR 3 stony steeds calculates to EL 11 but is effectively EL 9.</p><p></p><p><strong>Challenge Rating:</strong> 7 (also see Sand-Shifter Encounter Groups)</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Why 14 ranks in Listen and Spot?</p><p></p><p>Consider the Stone Giant, which seems the closest SRD giant to our boy. They have Climb +11, Hide +6*, Jump +11, Spot +12 with a +8 racial on the Hide. It doesn't even have any ranks in Listen! Even the Hill Giant has Listen (the SRD's Hillie has Climb +7, Jump +7, Listen +3, Spot +6 as skills).</p><p></p><p>Let's see how the Skill Ranks work out for those two:</p><p></p><p><strong>Hill (12 HD):</strong> Climb +7 [+7Str –3Hide], Jump +7 [+7Str –3Hide], Listen +3 [+0Wis], Spot +6 [+0Wis]</p><p><em>15 Skill Points:</em> Climb 3 SP, Jump 3 SP, Listen 3 SP, Spot 6 SP</p><p><strong>Stone (13 HD):</strong> Climb +11 [+8Str –3Hide], Hide +6* (<em>+14 rocky terrain</em>) [+2Dex –3Hide –4size], Jump +11 [+8Str –3Hide], Spot +12[+1Wis]</p><p><em>34 Skill Points:</em> Climb 6 SP, Hide 11 SP, Jump 6 SP, Spot 11 SP</p><p></p><p>OK, I agree on giving them Hide, Ride and Spot but Listen seems a low-priority skill comparable to, say, Handle Animal or Survival. How about we give them similar Hide and Spot skill level as the Stone Giant and divide out the remainders between Handle Animal, Listen, Ride or Survival? We'll want Ride to be at least +9 so it can auto-succeed on DC 10 "fight with warhorse" checks…</p><p></p><p>…Hmm, I tried some numbers and we just don't have the SPs for all of those skills at a reasonable number of ranks so we'll have to trim some of them down to low numbers.</p><p></p><p>Maybe something like:</p><p></p><p><strong>Desert (13 HD):</strong> Hide +2* (<em>+6 in desert, +16 with camouflage</em>) [+1Dex –4size](<em>+4Racial</em>), Handle Animal +3 [+0Cha], Listen +3 [+0Wis], Ride +9 [+1Dex], Spot +10 [+0Wis], Survival +3 [+0Wis]</p><p><em>32 Skill Points:</em> Hide 5 SP, Handle Animal 3 SP, Listen 3 SP, Ride 8 SP, Spot 10 SP, Survival 3 SP</p><p></p><p>for…</p><p></p><p><strong>Skills:</strong> Hide +2* (<em>+6 in desert, +16 with camouflage</em>), Handle Animal +3, Listen +3, Ride +9, Spot +10, Survival +3</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Those are fine, except I'd prefer Point Blank Shot over Cleave.</p><p></p><p>For comparison:</p><p></p><p><strong>Hill:</strong> Cleave, Improved Bull Rush, Power Attack, Improved Sunder, Weapon Focus (greatclub)</p><p><strong>Stone:</strong> Combat Reflexes, Iron Will, Point Blank Shot, Power Attack, Precise Shot</p><p></p><p><strong>Desert (Cleon Version):</strong> Power Attack, Iron Will, Mounted Combat, Mounted Archery, Point Blank Shot</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cleon, post: 8303843, member: 57383"] Updating the [URL='https://enworld.org/index.php?posts/8061974'][B]Desert Giant Working Draft[/B][/URL]. Unsurprisingly I agree with Challenge Rating 7 for the basic desert giant, but CR 8 is too low for a sand-shifter. Consider, each of the petrified ancestors is CR 7 and on average a sand-shifter can summon four of them. On paper that's five CR 7 opponents which the Encounter Number table says is Encounter Level 12! However, since the sand-shifter is the "load bearing boss" who maintains the ancestor's presence on this plane, knocking them out will cause the four sand-shifted opponents to vanish. I'd eyeball it as around Encounter Level 10. So maybe we should make it Encounter Number based? Let's see, if we assume that "vanishing when the sand-shifter falls" is worth a -1 Encounter Level Adjustment, then the standard Encounter Numbers table would expand to something like: [TABLE] [TR] [TD][B]Encounter Level (including sand-shifter)[/B][/TD] [TD][B]Summoned Creatures[/B][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]EL 7[/TD] [TD]1 petrified ancestor [B]or[/B] 5-6 stony steed[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]EL 8[/TD] [TD]2 petrified ancestors [B]or[/B] 7-9 stony steeds[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]EL 9[/TD] [TD]3 petrified ancestors [B]or[/B] 10-12 stony steeds[/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]EL 10[/TD] [TD]4 petrified ancestors [B]or[/B] [COLOR=red]13-18 stony steeds*[/COLOR][/TD] [/TR] [TR] [TD]EL 11[/TD] [TD]5 or 6 petrified ancestors [B]or[/B] [COLOR=red]19-24 stony steeds*[/COLOR][/TD] [/TR] [/TABLE] * The encounter numbers table maxes out at 10-12, since mobs of low CR opponents are pretty worthless in 3.5 edition. So I think I'd add the following to the Sand-Shifters entry… [I]Sand-Shifter Encounters:[/I] An adult sand-shifter is Challenge Rating 7 and an immature sand-shifter is Challenge Rating 5 (or CR 4 if Medium sized). If the sand-shifter has used sand-shifting its Encounter Level increases depending on how many creatures it summons: [B]EL 8[/B] for two petrified ancestors, 9 stony steeds, or one ancestor plus 5-6 steeds; [B]EL 9[/B] for three petrified ancestors, 10-12 stony steeds, two ancestors plus 5-6 steeds, or one ancestor plus 7–12 steeds; [B]EL 10[/B] for four petrified ancestors, 13-18 stony steeds, three ancestors plus 5-6 steeds, or two ancestor plus 7-12 steeds; and finally [B]EL 11[/B] for five or six petrified ancestors, 19-24 stony steeds, or three ancestors plus 7-12 steeds. No, I think that's too messy. I can make that simpler. How's this: [I]Sand-Shifter Encounter Groups:[/I] An adult sand-shifter is Challenge Rating 7 while immature sand-shifters are CR 5 (Large) or CR 4 (Medium). If a sand-shifter has summoned creatures to the desert giant's aid, include the petrified ancestors and stony steeds when calculating a group's Encounter Numbers (i.e. three desert giants plus four petrified ancestors is seven CR 7 creatures for an Encounter Level of 13). Impose a –1 or –2 penalty to the EL if there's a significant proportion of petrified ancestors and stony steeds and the sand-shifter is part of the encounter, since the shifting-sand creatures will vanish if their summoner loses consciousness. For example, a CR 7 desert giant plus a CR 5 immature sand-shifter and ten to twelve CR 3 stony steeds calculates to EL 11 but is effectively EL 9. [B]Challenge Rating:[/B] 7 (also see Sand-Shifter Encounter Groups) Why 14 ranks in Listen and Spot? Consider the Stone Giant, which seems the closest SRD giant to our boy. They have Climb +11, Hide +6*, Jump +11, Spot +12 with a +8 racial on the Hide. It doesn't even have any ranks in Listen! Even the Hill Giant has Listen (the SRD's Hillie has Climb +7, Jump +7, Listen +3, Spot +6 as skills). Let's see how the Skill Ranks work out for those two: [B]Hill (12 HD):[/B] Climb +7 [+7Str –3Hide], Jump +7 [+7Str –3Hide], Listen +3 [+0Wis], Spot +6 [+0Wis] [I]15 Skill Points:[/I] Climb 3 SP, Jump 3 SP, Listen 3 SP, Spot 6 SP [B]Stone (13 HD):[/B] Climb +11 [+8Str –3Hide], Hide +6* ([I]+14 rocky terrain[/I]) [+2Dex –3Hide –4size], Jump +11 [+8Str –3Hide], Spot +12[+1Wis] [I]34 Skill Points:[/I] Climb 6 SP, Hide 11 SP, Jump 6 SP, Spot 11 SP OK, I agree on giving them Hide, Ride and Spot but Listen seems a low-priority skill comparable to, say, Handle Animal or Survival. How about we give them similar Hide and Spot skill level as the Stone Giant and divide out the remainders between Handle Animal, Listen, Ride or Survival? We'll want Ride to be at least +9 so it can auto-succeed on DC 10 "fight with warhorse" checks… …Hmm, I tried some numbers and we just don't have the SPs for all of those skills at a reasonable number of ranks so we'll have to trim some of them down to low numbers. Maybe something like: [B]Desert (13 HD):[/B] Hide +2* ([I]+6 in desert, +16 with camouflage[/I]) [+1Dex –4size]([I]+4Racial[/I]), Handle Animal +3 [+0Cha], Listen +3 [+0Wis], Ride +9 [+1Dex], Spot +10 [+0Wis], Survival +3 [+0Wis] [I]32 Skill Points:[/I] Hide 5 SP, Handle Animal 3 SP, Listen 3 SP, Ride 8 SP, Spot 10 SP, Survival 3 SP for… [B]Skills:[/B] Hide +2* ([I]+6 in desert, +16 with camouflage[/I]), Handle Animal +3, Listen +3, Ride +9, Spot +10, Survival +3 Those are fine, except I'd prefer Point Blank Shot over Cleave. For comparison: [B]Hill:[/B] Cleave, Improved Bull Rush, Power Attack, Improved Sunder, Weapon Focus (greatclub) [B]Stone:[/B] Combat Reflexes, Iron Will, Point Blank Shot, Power Attack, Precise Shot [B]Desert (Cleon Version):[/B] Power Attack, Iron Will, Mounted Combat, Mounted Archery, Point Blank Shot [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Hosted Forums
Creature Catalog Forums
General Monster Talk
Converting Creatures from Other Campaign Settings
Top