Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
Hosted Forums
Creature Catalog Forums
General Monster Talk
Converting Planescape monsters
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cleon" data-source="post: 7262114" data-attributes="member: 57383"><p>What are we doing about the "only damages people if at least one opponent believe it is real" ability? That seems a bit wonky. Why should a creature take damage from the figment if someone else believes in it? Also, if EVERYONE in the fight has to succeed on a save against EVERY figment the chances of at least one failure are so great it's not really worth bothering.</p><p></p><p>It was quite a common mechanism for AD&D illusions, except it was only those who failed the saves who risked taking the damage!</p><p></p><p>Also, it'd require a ridiculous amount of dice rolling. In the adventure Tomin can summon four figments per round - that's four saving throws per PC each round!</p><p></p><p>Maybe rationalize it a bit so only one Will save per person for a group of figments is required, and if ALL succeed no one will take damage, but if anyone fails the figments gain enough "substance" to inflict damage, but do reduced damage (maybe half?) to those who made their saves.</p><p></p><p>It'd need to be a non-standard saving throw, maybe calculate it based on the total HD of figments plus the highest Charisma modifier amongst the figments?</p><p></p><p>Hmm… if we gave them all the same Charisma modifier that'd mean a group of four 2 HD Small figments would require the same saving throw to disbelieve as a single 8 HD Large figment, but 1 point lower than two 5 HD Medium figments.</p><p></p><p>Alternatively, if we used the proposed +2 step progression of their Dex, Con & Wis (to go with their Int 1/3/5) then a single 8 HD Large figment would have the same disbelieve DC as two 5 HD Medium figments, since the 2 HD difference will be balanced out by the 2-point higher Charisma. Contrariwise, four 2 HD Small figments would have a 2-point lower disbelieve DC.</p><p></p><p>Hmm… I think I like the progressive Cha approach better. If the lower disbelief DC of a group of 2 HD figments is bothersome we could make the standard Small figments 3 HD creatures, but I'm OK with them being 2 HD. We could always arbitrarily give them something that grants a +2 to the DC, but that doesn't seem necessary.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cleon, post: 7262114, member: 57383"] What are we doing about the "only damages people if at least one opponent believe it is real" ability? That seems a bit wonky. Why should a creature take damage from the figment if someone else believes in it? Also, if EVERYONE in the fight has to succeed on a save against EVERY figment the chances of at least one failure are so great it's not really worth bothering. It was quite a common mechanism for AD&D illusions, except it was only those who failed the saves who risked taking the damage! Also, it'd require a ridiculous amount of dice rolling. In the adventure Tomin can summon four figments per round - that's four saving throws per PC each round! Maybe rationalize it a bit so only one Will save per person for a group of figments is required, and if ALL succeed no one will take damage, but if anyone fails the figments gain enough "substance" to inflict damage, but do reduced damage (maybe half?) to those who made their saves. It'd need to be a non-standard saving throw, maybe calculate it based on the total HD of figments plus the highest Charisma modifier amongst the figments? Hmm… if we gave them all the same Charisma modifier that'd mean a group of four 2 HD Small figments would require the same saving throw to disbelieve as a single 8 HD Large figment, but 1 point lower than two 5 HD Medium figments. Alternatively, if we used the proposed +2 step progression of their Dex, Con & Wis (to go with their Int 1/3/5) then a single 8 HD Large figment would have the same disbelieve DC as two 5 HD Medium figments, since the 2 HD difference will be balanced out by the 2-point higher Charisma. Contrariwise, four 2 HD Small figments would have a 2-point lower disbelieve DC. Hmm… I think I like the progressive Cha approach better. If the lower disbelief DC of a group of 2 HD figments is bothersome we could make the standard Small figments 3 HD creatures, but I'm OK with them being 2 HD. We could always arbitrarily give them something that grants a +2 to the DC, but that doesn't seem necessary. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
Hosted Forums
Creature Catalog Forums
General Monster Talk
Converting Planescape monsters
Top