Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Converting skill tricks to expanded uses of skills and new feats
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Crashy75" data-source="post: 3306783" data-attributes="member: 11017"><p>Li, I like your thinking so far. I haven't had time to read completely so forgive anything I've missed. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>+5 to the DC? Personally, i don't think bluff fits very well. Would a diplomacy retry (with no penalty) be so bad? The skill implies that retries would have some sort of penalty. You could make a 'normal' retry have some sort of penalty (-5 if allowed at all) with this trick eliminating the penalty and assuring a single retry. I'd give it a req: 5 dip, 1 sense motive.</p><p></p><p></p><p>mmm... I don't like this one for 3 reasons:</p><p></p><p>#1 As you said, Sleight of Hand can't mask verbal components. </p><p></p><p>#2: I'm leery about giving virtual feats to full spellcasters when they are so powerful as it is. The one thing I did like about SoH is that 5 cross-class ranks are a pain to come by and it makes the ability hard to sustain at higher levels. Though, I have a sneaking suspicion that the bedazzler gets SoH as a class skill.</p><p></p><p>#3: To me, the reason casting a spell provokes AoO's is because the caster has to let his guard down to cast spells. I don't think it matters if the attacker thinks he's casting a spell or weaving a basket. If the same caster were to cast a silenced, stilled, eschewed spell, he'd still provoke an AoO unless he also cast defensively even though nobody around him would know he's casting a spell. That’s my feeling anyway. Also, I think this trick should be for social situations where it's inappropriate to cast a spell or perhaps as a way to avoid a counterspell.</p><p></p><p>I think the reason they used SoH, and not bluff (for example) is that bards have it and most other casters don't. I <em>really</em> don't think this should be a spellcraft roll. Every 2nd level wizard (and really everybody else including CoD) would have this by 2nd level. Druids and wizards have enough. What to do...</p><p>Maaaybe Req: bluff 8 ranks. Opposed bluff check. Still provoke an AoO. No counterspell. Useful for the bard (needs a boost), sorcerer (also needs a boost if he wants to compete with the wiz with a wand/scroll belt) and probably the bedazzler (doesn't need a boost really) idk.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I believe the idea is that you conceal your exact position behind your long flowing dress and such. </p><p>But sure, I agree that it should be a perform check.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I agree that spellcraft doesn't fit. Really, I think Knowledge (Arcana) is the best fit. Appraise is really about finding the value of an item where Kno (arcana) is about everything magical (except casting/identifying/scribing spells- that's spellcraft.) I just thought of an argument for appraise though. Any given magical property has a gold cost associated with it. A mage armor scroll is less valuable than a wish scroll for example. Appraise would be useless if the appraiser didn't know the magical properties of said item. Perhaps appraise would be the best. I just can't decide. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>I really see tumble here.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Crashy75, post: 3306783, member: 11017"] Li, I like your thinking so far. I haven't had time to read completely so forgive anything I've missed. +5 to the DC? Personally, i don't think bluff fits very well. Would a diplomacy retry (with no penalty) be so bad? The skill implies that retries would have some sort of penalty. You could make a 'normal' retry have some sort of penalty (-5 if allowed at all) with this trick eliminating the penalty and assuring a single retry. I'd give it a req: 5 dip, 1 sense motive. mmm... I don't like this one for 3 reasons: #1 As you said, Sleight of Hand can't mask verbal components. #2: I'm leery about giving virtual feats to full spellcasters when they are so powerful as it is. The one thing I did like about SoH is that 5 cross-class ranks are a pain to come by and it makes the ability hard to sustain at higher levels. Though, I have a sneaking suspicion that the bedazzler gets SoH as a class skill. #3: To me, the reason casting a spell provokes AoO's is because the caster has to let his guard down to cast spells. I don't think it matters if the attacker thinks he's casting a spell or weaving a basket. If the same caster were to cast a silenced, stilled, eschewed spell, he'd still provoke an AoO unless he also cast defensively even though nobody around him would know he's casting a spell. That’s my feeling anyway. Also, I think this trick should be for social situations where it's inappropriate to cast a spell or perhaps as a way to avoid a counterspell. I think the reason they used SoH, and not bluff (for example) is that bards have it and most other casters don't. I [I]really[/I] don't think this should be a spellcraft roll. Every 2nd level wizard (and really everybody else including CoD) would have this by 2nd level. Druids and wizards have enough. What to do... Maaaybe Req: bluff 8 ranks. Opposed bluff check. Still provoke an AoO. No counterspell. Useful for the bard (needs a boost), sorcerer (also needs a boost if he wants to compete with the wiz with a wand/scroll belt) and probably the bedazzler (doesn't need a boost really) idk. I believe the idea is that you conceal your exact position behind your long flowing dress and such. But sure, I agree that it should be a perform check. I agree that spellcraft doesn't fit. Really, I think Knowledge (Arcana) is the best fit. Appraise is really about finding the value of an item where Kno (arcana) is about everything magical (except casting/identifying/scribing spells- that's spellcraft.) I just thought of an argument for appraise though. Any given magical property has a gold cost associated with it. A mage armor scroll is less valuable than a wish scroll for example. Appraise would be useless if the appraiser didn't know the magical properties of said item. Perhaps appraise would be the best. I just can't decide. I really see tumble here. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Converting skill tricks to expanded uses of skills and new feats
Top