Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Guest 7037866" data-source="post: 9358485"><p>You can have a +2 STR and +1 CON and still be weak and smart. People have played weak, smart half-orcs (even orcs probably...) for decades without having to include floating ASIs. You simply put the scores where you want them to reflect your character.</p><p></p><p>You might not be able to be <em>as smart</em> as a smart Gnome, but that doesn't mean you aren't still smart. Having racial ASIs have never limited any concept. If it really bothers people, they should be honest that it really about getting higher bonuses so they "feel better" about their PC...</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yep. (with a BIG however...)</p><p></p><p>However, all we can address is humans. All the other races are made-up, so who can say whether a female dwarf can't be as strong as a male dwarf? And then there is the argument that D&D humans aren't "Earth humans" so shouldn't have the same limitations. Frankly, I don't buy that argument, but for people who do you can just <em>ignore</em> the caps like some people did in 1E. <img class="smilie smilie--emoji" alt="🤷♂️" src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f937-2642.png" title="Man shrugging :man_shrugging:" data-shortname=":man_shrugging:" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" /></p><p></p><p></p><p>No, you can still have ability scores for attack, damage, etc., just remove the ASIs for race.</p><p></p><p>However you generate ability scores (rolling, point-buy, standard array, or something else), you are very likely going to have higher scores and lower scores. You want to play a "strong" (whatever race) then put your best score in Strength. You want to be a "smart" (whatever race) then it goes into Intelligence, and so on.</p><p></p><p>All ASIs do for race is bump the numbers even higher, which we don't need IMO.</p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, it is odd. Goliaths with Powerful Build are "stronger" in that they can automatically lift/carry more weight. They are obviously "superior" to other races in this respect, and no one seems to take issue with that.</p><p></p><p>But incorporate a +2 STR modifier and suddenly it is a cry to arms against the Verisimilitude Gods!</p><p></p><p></p><p>The bedrock upon which something bad is built doesn't make the bedrock, itself, bad.</p><p></p><p>Biology among creatures is fact. Some are faster than others, some smarter, some can fly, others breathe water, etc. None of this, in and off itself, is bad or wrong.</p><p></p><p>For games like D&D, having actually adjustments in ability score numbers represent <em>significant</em> differences. Consider humans and elves. If you go with the baseline human, you get +1 to all scores. Elves get +2 Dex and +1 something else (typically). So, elves have superior Dex (by +1), equal in another "something else", and are inferior to humans in all other ability scores...</p><p></p><p>The same holds true comparing humans to virtually every other race. Humans are better than all other races in more things in this respect because they have <em>six</em> +1 ASIs, as where other races have two or occasionally three, most of which only allow them to <em>equal</em> humans (every +1).</p><p></p><p>There is nothing wrong with this because it is biology and/or spirtual. Halfings are Brave and so have a better chance of resisting fear, etc. They have something "inside" themselves that gives them an inner strength, confidence, and belief beyond other races. In our games, halfings get CHA +2 (not DEX) to represent this.</p><p></p><p>Dragonborn have CHA +1 because of the spirtual wherewithal and confidence gleaned from the dragon heritage.</p><p></p><p>Every single racial ASI can be justified by such means.</p><p></p><p>And, since 5E does not impose caps, any PC orc can have a INT 20 eventually. Sure, it will take longer, you might have to sacrifice a bit more, but in this way your PC is overcoming their racial limitation. Having the determination to overcome limitations should be celebrated, not just hand-waving them away.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Guest 7037866, post: 9358485"] You can have a +2 STR and +1 CON and still be weak and smart. People have played weak, smart half-orcs (even orcs probably...) for decades without having to include floating ASIs. You simply put the scores where you want them to reflect your character. You might not be able to be [I]as smart[/I] as a smart Gnome, but that doesn't mean you aren't still smart. Having racial ASIs have never limited any concept. If it really bothers people, they should be honest that it really about getting higher bonuses so they "feel better" about their PC... Yep. (with a BIG however...) However, all we can address is humans. All the other races are made-up, so who can say whether a female dwarf can't be as strong as a male dwarf? And then there is the argument that D&D humans aren't "Earth humans" so shouldn't have the same limitations. Frankly, I don't buy that argument, but for people who do you can just [I]ignore[/I] the caps like some people did in 1E. 🤷♂️ No, you can still have ability scores for attack, damage, etc., just remove the ASIs for race. However you generate ability scores (rolling, point-buy, standard array, or something else), you are very likely going to have higher scores and lower scores. You want to play a "strong" (whatever race) then put your best score in Strength. You want to be a "smart" (whatever race) then it goes into Intelligence, and so on. All ASIs do for race is bump the numbers even higher, which we don't need IMO. Yeah, it is odd. Goliaths with Powerful Build are "stronger" in that they can automatically lift/carry more weight. They are obviously "superior" to other races in this respect, and no one seems to take issue with that. But incorporate a +2 STR modifier and suddenly it is a cry to arms against the Verisimilitude Gods! The bedrock upon which something bad is built doesn't make the bedrock, itself, bad. Biology among creatures is fact. Some are faster than others, some smarter, some can fly, others breathe water, etc. None of this, in and off itself, is bad or wrong. For games like D&D, having actually adjustments in ability score numbers represent [I]significant[/I] differences. Consider humans and elves. If you go with the baseline human, you get +1 to all scores. Elves get +2 Dex and +1 something else (typically). So, elves have superior Dex (by +1), equal in another "something else", and are inferior to humans in all other ability scores... The same holds true comparing humans to virtually every other race. Humans are better than all other races in more things in this respect because they have [I]six[/I] +1 ASIs, as where other races have two or occasionally three, most of which only allow them to [I]equal[/I] humans (every +1). There is nothing wrong with this because it is biology and/or spirtual. Halfings are Brave and so have a better chance of resisting fear, etc. They have something "inside" themselves that gives them an inner strength, confidence, and belief beyond other races. In our games, halfings get CHA +2 (not DEX) to represent this. Dragonborn have CHA +1 because of the spirtual wherewithal and confidence gleaned from the dragon heritage. Every single racial ASI can be justified by such means. And, since 5E does not impose caps, any PC orc can have a INT 20 eventually. Sure, it will take longer, you might have to sacrifice a bit more, but in this way your PC is overcoming their racial limitation. Having the determination to overcome limitations should be celebrated, not just hand-waving them away. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Dungeons & Dragons
Convince me that the Ranger is a necessary Class.
Top