Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="DEFCON 1" data-source="post: 9669299" data-attributes="member: 7006">It should be just as likely as finding players if the game only had the four classes they said the game should have.&nbsp; If they truly believe the game works best with only the Core Four, then there's no reason to think they shouldn't be able to convince a couple other people of the same thing to create a table.Unless of course playing Core Four isn't as correct or as good as they want to believe it is and thus all their potential players question why they are only allowing the fighter, rogue, cleric, and wizard.&nbsp; Ay which point they need to have their explanations in their holsters ready to draw and hope their arguments actually hold weight with those potential players.But in truth, I personally believe going only Core Four + subclasses ISN'T appreciably better than using the additional eight classes and I would imagine most of the rest of the millions of D&amp;D players feel the same.&nbsp; Different?&nbsp; Sure.&nbsp; Better?&nbsp; No.&nbsp; Which means the only way the Core Four stans would ever get to play the game they want would be if WotC forced everyone's hand to play that way by only printing the Core Four in their books.&nbsp; Which is why they keep posting around here that that's the way they wished the game was made... because they need WotC to do the dirty work they themselves are not capable of.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="DEFCON 1, post: 9669299, member: 7006"] It should be just as likely as finding players if the game only had the four classes they said the game should have. If they truly believe the game works best with only the Core Four, then there's no reason to think they shouldn't be able to convince a couple other people of the same thing to create a table. Unless of course playing Core Four [I]isn't[/I] as correct or as good as they want to believe it is and thus all their potential players question why they are only allowing the fighter, rogue, cleric, and wizard. Ay which point they need to have their explanations in their holsters ready to draw and hope their arguments actually hold weight with those potential players. But in truth, I personally believe going only Core Four + subclasses ISN'T appreciably better than using the additional eight classes and I would imagine most of the rest of the millions of D&D players feel the same. Different? Sure. [I]Better?[/I] No. Which means the only way the Core Four stans would ever get to play the game they want would be if WotC [I]forced[/I] everyone's hand to play that way by only printing the Core Four in their books. Which is why they keep posting around here that that's the way they wished the game was made... because they need WotC to do the dirty work they themselves are not capable of. [/QUOTE]

Verification