Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Cadriel" data-source="post: 6581366" data-attributes="member: 4295">I'm not sure what you mean by MMO-style; I actually like how a lot of the enemies in the dungeon areas could be in different places depending on other circumstances, and there are several that are set up for a really good narrative &quot;bang&quot; like the ghouls in Rivergard Keep. Which encounters are problems for you?As far as sense of doom, I really disagree. The setup of Red Larch is such that, if the PCs don't act rather efficiently, the cults will be after them in significant ways. There are multiple spies and ways for them to get mixed into the intrigue. There is explicitly a sense of immediate danger throughout that chapter.I wonder if people are skipping the first couple of chapters and just reading the dungeon sections? Because I think there's a good deal of logical setup in PotA that I am not seeing reflected in a lot of the comments about it.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Cadriel, post: 6581366, member: 4295"] I'm not sure what you mean by MMO-style; I actually like how a lot of the enemies in the dungeon areas could be in different places depending on other circumstances, and there are several that are set up for a really good narrative "bang" like the ghouls in Rivergard Keep. Which encounters are problems for you? As far as sense of doom, I really disagree. The setup of Red Larch is such that, if the PCs don't act rather efficiently, the cults will be after them in significant ways. There are multiple spies and ways for them to get mixed into the intrigue. There is explicitly a sense of immediate danger throughout that chapter. I wonder if people are skipping the first couple of chapters and just reading the dungeon sections? Because I think there's a good deal of logical setup in PotA that I am not seeing reflected in a lot of the comments about it. [/QUOTE]

Verification