Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.

Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="Wyrm" data-source="post: 296592" data-attributes="member: 6510">Hey,This is my first post to the message boards, after lurking here for about 2 years.  I must say that the level of intelligence on these boards is much higher than many other I've been to.A possible rules change that I'm considering mainly as a thought experiment is if it would be viable to remove some of the spellcasting classes and replace them with a Caster that uses spell seeds from 1st level.Some obvious problems:-Knowledge requirement to get spells (the 10 per spell)-Spellcraft DCs for the standard seeds would be very difficult at low levels (although not impossible)Some advantages:-a more varied mystical system where spells are part of the personality of the character-no similarity between spellcaster's spell lists-more work on the part of the player/DMMy thoughts are that the class would be something like this:EDIT-->>>> Look down a few posts for the long revised version of this.SpellcasterHD: d4Saves: One good of choiceBAB: As wizardSpells per day are based on the spellcraft DC of the spell created and the knowledge scoreMaybe something like this:0-5 DC 4+1 per knowledge/10 round down per day6-10 DC 3+1 per knowledge/10 round down per day10-20 DC 2+1 per knowledge/10 round down per day20-40 DC 1 + 1 per knowledge/10 round down per day40 and up DC 1 per knowledge/10 round down per dayThen the class abilities would be:No creation cost (perhaps institute the cost for spells over DC 40)Less Time to Create (maybe a week of study for below DC 40)Lower Spellcraft DC (the DC for spellcraft checks of spells that the Spellcaster creates would be lowered by 1/level up to a max of 10)SkillFocus(Spellcraft) at 15thIs this a really stupid idea or may there be some way that this could work? (I've also thought of making lower DC seeds and using a similar system)Constructive criticism and comments would be much appreciated.</blockquote>

Verification