Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Gez" data-source="post: 763462" data-attributes="member: 1328">What part of &quot;I'm a fanatical slayer and members of a death cult that use drugs, meditations techniques, and mystical esoteric blah-blah in order to better become a fanatical slayer and member of a death cult&quot; don't rhyme with &quot;if I were in a D&amp;D world, I would cast spells&quot; ?Well, the D&amp;D staff sure ought to have looked at a crystal ball and said, &quot;hey, people, we would have made a mystical assassin class, but we decided against it because we've seen that in the future, some people who wants to convert Al Qadim will make up something for that&quot;.If you want an assassin that don't cast spell, have the PC stays a simple rogue.Yeah, only elf can be magic. For example, let say you have a race that can speak with animals and cast spells, just because they are of that race, but they are not elf; they could not take up a ranger class that speaks with animals and cast spells.I like the use of &quot;normally.&quot; Aren't you saying that people who thinks the ranger is fine (or at least, OK) as it is don't have a normal mind ? <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" /> Bah, use my alt. barbarian, slap the ranger name on it, and be happy. <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f61b.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":p" title="Stick out tongue&nbsp; &nbsp; :p"&nbsp; data-smilie="7"data-shortname=":p" />You could probably take the barbarian, remove rage, and compensate by good reflex saves. And, let say, Evasion at level 8 instead of 3 rage/day, Improved Evasion at level 15 instead of greater rage, and finally Mettle* at level 20 instead of the no-longer-tired thing.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Gez, post: 763462, member: 1328"] What part of "I'm a fanatical slayer and members of a death cult that use drugs, meditations techniques, and mystical esoteric blah-blah in order to better become a fanatical slayer and member of a death cult" don't rhyme with "if I were in a D&D world, I would cast spells" ? Well, the D&D staff sure ought to have looked at a crystal ball and said, "hey, people, we would have made a mystical assassin class, but we decided against it because we've seen that in the future, some people who wants to convert Al Qadim will make up something for that". If you want an assassin that don't cast spell, have the PC stays a simple rogue. Yeah, only elf can be magic. For example, let say you have a race that can speak with animals and cast spells, just because they are of that race, but they are not elf; they could not take up a ranger class that speaks with animals and cast spells. I like the use of "normally." Aren't you saying that people who thinks the ranger is fine (or at least, OK) as it is don't have a normal mind ? :p Bah, use my alt. barbarian, slap the ranger name on it, and be happy. :p [i]You could probably take the barbarian, remove rage, and compensate by good reflex saves. And, let say, Evasion at level 8 instead of 3 rage/day, Improved Evasion at level 15 instead of greater rage, and finally Mettle* at level 20 instead of the no-longer-tired thing.[/i] [/QUOTE]

Verification