Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions, OSR, & D&D Variants
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Upgrade your account to a Community Supporter account and remove most of the site ads.
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Core materials: Action Points and Insider
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="WhimsyTheFae" data-source="post: 3758791" data-attributes="member: 8964"><p>I like Action Points, but I do hope that their implementation in 4e is handled properly.</p><p></p><p>What I like about Action Points (or similar mechanics):</p><p></p><p>- Avoid death. I like that you can stabilize or otherwise avoid death with a limited resource.</p><p></p><p>- Reroll/Add to roll. I like the ability to reroll a bad roll, but it only gives you a chance to roll better. I like the ability to add to your roll, so that you can exceed your normal potential, but it doesn't do much to save you from a bad roll. I don't know which one I would prefer...</p><p></p><p>- Non-arbitrary rewarding of Action Points. I don't mind starting each session by giving my players 3 Action Points (or some other number) and saying, that's all you get. I also don't mind the SWSE style where you get so many at any given level and they reset when you gain a new level.</p><p></p><p>What I don't like:</p><p></p><p>- Standard options tied to Action Points. Action Points should allow you to do extra, not be required to used standard options. I don't like how SWSE uses Force Points to fuel certain abilities.</p><p></p><p>- I don't like when Action Points are used to unlock a whole bunch of other stuff. Action Points, as per Unearthed Arcana, do too much, in my opinion. You can boost feats, you can emulate feats, you can take extra actions, etc. True20 Conviction goes even further. It's unnecessary added complexity.</p><p></p><p>- I don't like Action Point replenishing systems that require GM judgment and/or player contrivance. In True20, if you play your Virtue or Vice in a certain way (read, contrived way to negatively impact the character, but not too much), the GM may allow you to regain an Action Point. There other methods, as well, but outside of one-shots and convention-games, I am not too fond of them.</p><p></p><p></p><p>I hope that Action Points will:</p><p></p><p>A) Help a character avoid death, but not avoid injury or danger.</p><p></p><p>B) Help a character recover from a lousy roll, either by rerolling or adding to a roll.</p><p></p><p>C) Be replenished in a non-abritrary method, preferably at a slow pace.</p><p></p><p>That's it...</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="WhimsyTheFae, post: 3758791, member: 8964"] I like Action Points, but I do hope that their implementation in 4e is handled properly. What I like about Action Points (or similar mechanics): - Avoid death. I like that you can stabilize or otherwise avoid death with a limited resource. - Reroll/Add to roll. I like the ability to reroll a bad roll, but it only gives you a chance to roll better. I like the ability to add to your roll, so that you can exceed your normal potential, but it doesn't do much to save you from a bad roll. I don't know which one I would prefer... - Non-arbitrary rewarding of Action Points. I don't mind starting each session by giving my players 3 Action Points (or some other number) and saying, that's all you get. I also don't mind the SWSE style where you get so many at any given level and they reset when you gain a new level. What I don't like: - Standard options tied to Action Points. Action Points should allow you to do extra, not be required to used standard options. I don't like how SWSE uses Force Points to fuel certain abilities. - I don't like when Action Points are used to unlock a whole bunch of other stuff. Action Points, as per Unearthed Arcana, do too much, in my opinion. You can boost feats, you can emulate feats, you can take extra actions, etc. True20 Conviction goes even further. It's unnecessary added complexity. - I don't like Action Point replenishing systems that require GM judgment and/or player contrivance. In True20, if you play your Virtue or Vice in a certain way (read, contrived way to negatively impact the character, but not too much), the GM may allow you to regain an Action Point. There other methods, as well, but outside of one-shots and convention-games, I am not too fond of them. I hope that Action Points will: A) Help a character avoid death, but not avoid injury or danger. B) Help a character recover from a lousy roll, either by rerolling or adding to a roll. C) Be replenished in a non-abritrary method, preferably at a slow pace. That's it... [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Core materials: Action Points and Insider
Top