Menu
News
All News
Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
Pathfinder
Starfinder
Warhammer
2d20 System
Year Zero Engine
Industry News
Reviews
Dragon Reflections
White Dwarf Reflections
Columns
Weekly Digests
Weekly News Digest
Freebies, Sales & Bundles
RPG Print News
RPG Crowdfunding News
Game Content
ENterplanetary DimENsions
Mythological Figures
Opinion
Worlds of Design
Peregrine's Nest
RPG Evolution
Other Columns
From the Freelancing Frontline
Monster ENcyclopedia
WotC/TSR Alumni Look Back
4 Hours w/RSD (Ryan Dancey)
The Road to 3E (Jonathan Tweet)
Greenwood's Realms (Ed Greenwood)
Drawmij's TSR (Jim Ward)
Community
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Resources
Wiki
Pages
Latest activity
Media
New media
New comments
Search media
Downloads
Latest reviews
Search resources
EN Publishing
Store
EN5ider
Adventures in ZEITGEIST
Awfully Cheerful Engine
What's OLD is NEW
Judge Dredd & The Worlds Of 2000AD
War of the Burning Sky
Level Up: Advanced 5E
Events & Releases
Upcoming Events
Private Events
Featured Events
Socials!
EN Publishing
Twitter
BlueSky
Facebook
Instagram
EN World
BlueSky
YouTube
Facebook
Twitter
Twitch
Podcast
Features
Top 5 RPGs Compiled Charts 2004-Present
Adventure Game Industry Market Research Summary (RPGs) V1.0
Ryan Dancey: Acquiring TSR
Q&A With Gary Gygax
D&D Rules FAQs
TSR, WotC, & Paizo: A Comparative History
D&D Pronunciation Guide
Million Dollar TTRPG Kickstarters
Tabletop RPG Podcast Hall of Fame
Eric Noah's Unofficial D&D 3rd Edition News
D&D in the Mainstream
D&D & RPG History
About Morrus
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
Forums & Topics
Forum List
Latest Posts
Forum list
*Dungeons & Dragons
Level Up: Advanced 5th Edition
D&D Older Editions
*TTRPGs General
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
EN Publishing
*Geek Talk & Media
Search forums
Chat/Discord
Menu
Log in
Register
Install the app
Install
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Core vs. Mod - The Meta Question
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Andor" data-source="post: 5851243" data-attributes="member: 1879"><p>Yes, although I don't think that means it's weak or flavorless.</p><p></p><p>Not weak meaning the core system should be mathematically robust with enough wiggle room and the correct granularity to allow the desired degree of tuning. </p><p></p><p>Flavorless is impossible unless the core system includes no spells, magic items, races, weapons, monsters, etc. </p><p></p><p>I think there is a misconception (although it could well be me who has it) about what the core/module thing means.</p><p></p><p>To my mind the is no such thing as an "all options and modules off" character. There is one that uses the "Simplified progression" module, but that module is no more or less core than the one with 3e style feats or 4e style powers. It's probably the first module presented, because it's the easist to describe. It does not represent the baseline others grow from either. It grants simple bonuses that average out to about the same power level as the other modules.</p><p></p><p>Remember the goal of 5e isn't total campaign customization in the hands of the GM, it's playstyle customization in the hands of the players. Those modules are what you choose to help build a character that works the way you want it to work. They are not golden pools of awesome for your GM to hold mockingly out of your reach.</p><p></p><p>Some things will be in the GMs hands. If he doesn't want to use grids and minis he won't. Some things are in his perview, like magic items, but you should have a say. Some thing should be determined by the table before the campaign begins. "Will we use Vancian magic? Steve hates martial dailies but I really want to use that "Strike of the Happy Walrus" power."</p><p></p><p>Sometimes it will matter, if your GM has a very specific campaign world in his head he might say "All arcane magic is Vancian only. All Divine magic is point based. Psionics exist but to regain power points you have to eat a puppy, and I mean YOU, the player." And if you wanted something he outlawed you'll have to take it up with him, just like always.</p><p></p><p>For the generic game? It won't matter a whit which modules you use to build your character as long as you have it all on your sheet when the dice start rolling.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Andor, post: 5851243, member: 1879"] Yes, although I don't think that means it's weak or flavorless. Not weak meaning the core system should be mathematically robust with enough wiggle room and the correct granularity to allow the desired degree of tuning. Flavorless is impossible unless the core system includes no spells, magic items, races, weapons, monsters, etc. I think there is a misconception (although it could well be me who has it) about what the core/module thing means. To my mind the is no such thing as an "all options and modules off" character. There is one that uses the "Simplified progression" module, but that module is no more or less core than the one with 3e style feats or 4e style powers. It's probably the first module presented, because it's the easist to describe. It does not represent the baseline others grow from either. It grants simple bonuses that average out to about the same power level as the other modules. Remember the goal of 5e isn't total campaign customization in the hands of the GM, it's playstyle customization in the hands of the players. Those modules are what you choose to help build a character that works the way you want it to work. They are not golden pools of awesome for your GM to hold mockingly out of your reach. Some things will be in the GMs hands. If he doesn't want to use grids and minis he won't. Some things are in his perview, like magic items, but you should have a say. Some thing should be determined by the table before the campaign begins. "Will we use Vancian magic? Steve hates martial dailies but I really want to use that "Strike of the Happy Walrus" power." Sometimes it will matter, if your GM has a very specific campaign world in his head he might say "All arcane magic is Vancian only. All Divine magic is point based. Psionics exist but to regain power points you have to eat a puppy, and I mean YOU, the player." And if you wanted something he outlawed you'll have to take it up with him, just like always. For the generic game? It won't matter a whit which modules you use to build your character as long as you have it all on your sheet when the dice start rolling. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Community
General Tabletop Discussion
*Pathfinder & Starfinder
Core vs. Mod - The Meta Question
Top