Reply to thread

Message

<blockquote data-quote="Mistwell" data-source="post: 3421029" data-attributes="member: 2525">You use some strange words in your post.&nbsp; Like &quot; it *has* to be more expensive the more expensive the weapon is&quot;.&nbsp; And &quot;You can't use the Custserv method until you know what the cost of a +2 Crystal Echoblade is.&quot;No really, it doesn't HAVE to be more expensive, and you CAN use the CustServ method right now.&nbsp; There is no actual objective proof of your position, just a subjective one.&nbsp; I don't understand why you are stating it as if you KNOW the correct answer, without any doubt at all.MIC is in fact a change to WOTC's approach to magic items.&nbsp; The cost of magic items is specifically coming down because of the MIC.&nbsp; It's not an accident they did that, it's called out with a big note explaining that it is intentional, and the reasoning for it.&nbsp; This method suggested by others and CustServ and the new rules is consistent with that purpose.</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Mistwell, post: 3421029, member: 2525"] You use some strange words in your post. Like " it *has* to be more expensive the more expensive the weapon is". And "You can't use the Custserv method until you know what the cost of a +2 Crystal Echoblade is." No really, it doesn't HAVE to be more expensive, and you CAN use the CustServ method right now. There is no actual objective proof of your position, just a subjective one. I don't understand why you are stating it as if you KNOW the correct answer, without any doubt at all. MIC is in fact a change to WOTC's approach to magic items. The cost of magic items is specifically coming down because of the MIC. It's not an accident they did that, it's called out with a big note explaining that it is intentional, and the reasoning for it. This method suggested by others and CustServ and the new rules is consistent with that purpose. [/QUOTE]

Verification