Reply to thread

Message: <blockquote data-quote="gamerprinter" data-source="post: 5675548" data-attributes="member: 50895">Half glass full vs. half glass empty argument here. I never mentioned a battle - what battle are you talking about? I'm not talking about anyone failing, I'm only talking of how a company makes itself more successful. Fail? Battle? Don't put words in my mouth - I didn't say that. I'm responding to those that think Pathfinder has to become the known factor that D&D is in order to take market share. I'm saying that is isn't necessary. D&D can and should always be the big name in RPGs or what is respresentative of the market. This could all remain true and Pathfinder can be the default game, without ever being the default brand. I don't want anyone to fail, I just want the game I prefer to be more successful. Simple.</blockquote>